Phytochemical Analysis and Pharmacological Screening of Caralluma fimfriata wall. Whole Plant Extract
Thorat Sheela S.1, Patil Poonam J.2
1Adarsh College of Pharmacy, Vita
2Assiatant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Adarsh College of Pharmacy, Vita
*Corresponding Author E-mail: ssheelathorat@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Herbal plants are natural sourcefor obtaining natural medicines. The Caralluma fimfriata wall plant belongs to family Asclepiadaceae. The plant contain different chemical constituent such as alkaloid, flavonoid The main aim of the study was to extract the plant material by using methanol as a solvent by using soxhlet extraction method. from the phytochemical analysis, the plant was showed chemical constituent. The isolation and separation of chemical constituent were done by chromatograhic technique such as thin layer chromatography and column chromatography. The each chemical constituent were identified by performing its physical and chemical test. The isolated chemical constituent were subjected to further study that is it was used for spectral analysis, by using UV-Visible spectrophotometer, IR, NMR spectroscopy, Mass spectroscopy, The methanolic extract of Caralluma fimbriata was further used for pharmacological study such as immunomodulatory activity. The increase in immunomodulatory activity of C. fimbriata was done by using neutrophil adhesion test.
KEYWORDS: Caralluma Fimbiata, Chromatographic analysis, Spectral analysis, Immunomodulatory activity.
INTRODUCTION:
Herbal plants are natural source for obtaining naturalmedicines. It has low side effect and cheap medicaments as compare to the synthetic medicines. According to World Health Organization the 80% population of India has relies on Herbal medicines, and used for treatment of various diseases. The herbalism divided into different regions such as Traditional chinese herbalism and Ayurvedic herbalism. The Traditional drugs have that much importance as the herbal drugs but, the Ayurvedic system is the most important system in India.
There are various sources for obtaining natural products such as microorganism, animals, plants and marine sources.
· Plant Name: Caralluma fimbriata wall.
· Family: Asclepiadaceae
· Synonym: Caralluma fimbriata wall.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Drugs, chemicals and solvents:
Petroleum ether (60/80°), Methanol, Isopropyl alcohol, Benzene, Glacial acetic acid, Silica gel
Extracts used:
a) Methanolic extract of whole plant of Caralluma fimfriata wall.
b) Aqueous extract of whole plant of carallumafimbriata wall.
Instruments used:
a) Soxhlet continuous extraction apparatus (Borosil Mumbai)
b) IR Spectrophotometer Jasco FTIR- 8400
c) UBSET Jasco V-550 UV/Vis- spectrophotometer
d) Melting point apparatus-Veego VMP-1
Collection of plant:
Caralluma fimbriata plant material were collected from Dandoba Hill, Pandharpur road, Miraj (Maharashtra)
Authentification of the plant material:
Mr. M. D. Wadmare Dept. of Botony, Smt. Kasturbai Walchand College Sangli, authenticated the plant material.
Drying of Whole plant Material:
In the present study the collected plant material were sorted carefully and washed thoroughly to remove unwanted and debris. The material was dried in air. After complete drying the plant material were powdered by mixer grinder to obtain coarse powder.
Extraction of C. fimbriata Wall.:
The extaction of whole plant material was done by soxhlet extraction Method
Preparation of Methanolic extract of C. fimbriata Wall:
The aerial part of plant wasdefatted with the Petroleum ether to remove fatty material from plant. The Defatted material further extracted with pet ether by using methanol as a solvent, at the temperature 40-60 degree the extraction was continue until the extract or liquid of thimble became clear. After completion of extraction, the extract was concentrated at low temperature and also by using rotavapour. The extract was kept for drying in dessicator. The extract was used for further phytochemical analysis.
Phytochemical Screening of C. fimbriata Wall.
Table No. 1 Phytochemical Test for identification of chemical constituent
Sr. No. |
Test |
Flavanoid |
Alkaloid |
Steroid |
Glycoside |
1 |
Mayer test |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
2 |
Hagers test |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
3 |
Lieberman test |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
4 |
Lieberman Burcherd test |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
5 |
Keller killani test |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
6. |
Saponin test |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
7. |
Shinoda test |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Isolation of Chemical Constituent by Using Chromatographic Technique
Thin layer chromatography
Different constituent of extract of Plant material were separated by thin layer chromatographic plates containing silica gel in the Isopropyl alcohol: Benzene: Glacial acetic acid (2:8:1)
Table no. 2 Number of spot and Rf value
Sr. No. |
Sample |
RF value |
1. |
Spot No 1 |
0.90 |
2. |
Spot No 2 |
0.72 |
3. |
Spot No 3 |
0.63 |
Fig No1 TLC
Isolation of Chemical Costituent by using column Chromatography:
The Different chemical constituent were separated by column chromatography by using mobile phase such as Isopropyl alcohol: Benzene: Glacial acetic acid (2:8:1) and all the chemical constituent were collected. And compared with standard drug, Physical and Chemical properties were evaluated. These isolated constituent were subjected for spectral analysis.
Physical and Chemical test for isolated fraction
Table No.3 Physical and chemical test of Isolated fraction
Test |
Observation |
Inference |
Physical evaluation Melting point |
130-132°c |
Phytosterol (B-sitesterol) might be present. |
Chemical evaluation a) Isolated fraction + chloroform+ conc. H2SO4 |
Reddish color in upper layer |
Sterol present |
b) Isolated fraction +H2SO4+ drops of acetic anhydride |
First red, then blue and finally green color appears. |
Sterol present |
c) Isolated fraction + acetic anhydride. Heat and cool. Add few drops of H2SO4 |
Blue color appears |
Sterol present |
Structural Elucidation:
The structural elucidation were done by UV-Visible Spectrophotometer, Infrared Spectrocopy, NMR, Mass Spectrophotometer.
Fig No. 2 Infrared Spectra of Isolated Compound
TableNo. 4 Interpretation of isolated compound
Sr No. |
Wave no. (cm-1) |
Functional group |
1 |
3370.96 |
O-H str. |
2 |
2922.29 |
aliphatic C-H str. |
3 |
1650.77 |
C=C str. |
4 |
1072.23 |
cycloalkane |
5 |
3234.04 |
Cyclic oiefin |
6 |
1590.02 |
C-C |
Table No. 5 Interpretation of Isolated comp
Sr No. |
δ ppm |
Indication |
1 |
0.805(S) |
Angular Methyl group |
2 |
1.19(d) |
terminal CH3 |
3 |
2.23(s) |
OH group |
4 |
7.3(s) |
Aromatic Group |
Fig. No. 3 H1 NMR of Isolated Compound
Fig No. 4 Mass Spectra of isolated compound
Table No.6 Major ion fragment of Isolated compound
Probable molecular fragments |
Peak (m/z) |
|
413 |
|
371 |
|
302 |
|
218
|
|
114 |
Pharmacological Study:
Experimental The Methanolic extract of C. fimbriata Wall and The dose was determined by depending on oral acute toxicity study.
Neutrophil Adhesion Test:
Rats were divided into four groups of five animals each. The rats were divided into grps such as control, test 1 and test 2 and standard. The dose and treatment were showed in the following chart.
Table No 7 Number of grps and treatment
Sr. No |
Groups |
Treatment, Dose and Route |
1. |
Control |
Distilled water |
2. |
Test 1 |
C. fimbriata Wall 100mg/kg(oral) |
3. |
Test 2 |
C. fimbriata Wall 150mg/kg(oral) |
4. |
Standard |
Levamisole 50mg/kg(oral) |
The blood samples from all the groups were collected by puncturing retro orbital plexus under mild ether anesthesia. Blood was collected in vials pre-treated by disodium EDTA and analyzed for total leukocyte count (TLC) and differential leukocyte count (DLC) by fixing blood smears and staining with Leishman’s stain. Percent neutrophil adhesion was calculated as follows,[3]
Neutrophil adhesion (%) = NIu – NIt × 100/NI
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
· The Extraction of whole plant material of Themethanolic extract of C. fimbriata Wall wallwas done by soxhlet extraction process. The plant extract was dried under dessicator and the extract further subjected to Phytochemical analysis.
· The extract were subjected to chromatographic analysis by thin layer chromatography, the mobile phase was Isopropyl alcohol: Benzene: Glacial acetic acid (2:8:1), from the thin layer chromatography it was showed 3 spots This spot were isolated by using Column chromatography.
· The isolated spot were identified by the physical and chemical analysis
· The isolated spot were subjected to spectral analysis for structural elucidation.
Spectroscopic study:
UV analysis of isolated sterol compound found maximum at 220 nm which was comparable with wavelength of standard sterol (b- sitesterol)
IR spectrum of sterol compound
Exhibitated characterstick peaks at 3370.96 (O-H str.), 2922.29 (aliphatic CH), 1072.23 (Cycloalkane), 3234.04 (cyclic olefinic, -HC=CH), 1590.02 (C-C), 1650.77 (C=C).
H1NMR Spectrum of sterol exhibited peaks at 0.805(angular methyl group), 1019 (terminal CH3), 2.23(OH group), 7.3 (aromatic group).
Mass Spectrum of sterol compound showed molecular mass at 413 having characteristic fragments observed at m/z 371,302,218,114.
Pharmacological Activity:
Neutrophil adhesion in control group animals was 30.68, in extract treated group animals at dose 100mg/kg body weight was 43.05, while treated animals group 150mg/kg body weight was 47.83. Standard drug treated animal group was 72.71.
There was a significant increase in % neutrohil adhesion for 100mg/kg 150mg/kg body weight and the standard Levamisole 50mg/kg body weight as compared to the control group increases% neutrophil adhesion value to 43.05±0.37, 47.83±0.51, 72.71±0.38 respectively.
The %neutrophil adhesion was significantly increased by C. fimbriata Wall. (100mg/kg/oral) and (150 mg/kg/oral) when compared with the control group, showed possible immunostimulant effect
Table no.8 Observation table of Neutrophil adhesion
Sr. No |
Groups |
Treatment, Dose and Route |
Neutrophil adhesion (Mean ±S.E.M.) |
1. |
Control |
Distilled water |
30.684±0.47 |
2. |
Test 1 |
C. fimbriata Wall 100mg/kg(oral) |
43.054±0.37 |
3. |
Test 2 |
C. fimbriata Wall 150mg/kg(oral) |
47.832±0.51 |
4. |
Standard |
Levamisole 50mg/kg(oral) |
72.71±0.38 |
Statistical Analysis:
All the results were expressed as mean ± Standard Error (SEM). Data were analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test
Fig no. Graph of %Neutrophil Adhesion Test
CONCLUSION:
From above observation, it was concluded that, the C. fimbriata Wall plant material contain different chemical constituent such as alkaloid, flavonoid, glycoside, steroid. In the immunomodulatory activity, from the observation it was showed that the C. fimbriata Wall plant shows increase in immunomodulatory activity as compared with control group, it may be due to presence of steroid in Plant material.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
Author Thankful and grateful to the Appasaheb Birnale College of Pharmacy, Sangli, for providing all necessary requirement for the completion of researchwork.and also thankful to the Principal Dr. D. D. Chougule Sir and Research Guide Dr. P. J. Shirote.
REFERENCES:
1. Attal R, Otari V, Shete V, (2010) Abrus Precaution Linnaeus A phytopharmacological review, Journal of Pharmacy & Research, 3 (11), 2085-87.
2. Chaudhary D, Goyal S, Poonia P, (2010), ‘Phytopharamcilogical Review’, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and drug Research, 2(2),91-98
3. KrishnasamyR, Periyasamy S, et.al., (2014), ‘Hepatoprotective and Antidiabetic Effect of Methanol Extract of Caralluma Fimbriatain Streptatozocin Induced Diabetic Albino Rats’, International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, (in press).
4. Rajendran R, Ambikar D., Khandare R., et.al., (2014), ‘Nootropic Activity of C. fimbriata Extract In Mice’, Food and Nutrition Sciences, 5, 147-52.
5. Soundararajan K, Rajendran R, Ramasamy V, et.al., (2011), ‘Effect of C. fimbriata Extract on 3T3-L1 Pre-Adipocyte Cell Division’, Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2,329-336.
6. Patil A, Patil A, Naingade S,. et.al., (2014), ‘Antioxidant Study and Phenolic Content of C. fimbriata Herb’, World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 3(7), 565-575.
7. JagtapS, Shidore P. Dange S, (2013), ‘Evaluation of antihyperglycemic and lipid lowering activity of carallumafimbriata diabetes induced rat’, American Journal of Pharmatech Research, 3(4), 2249-3387.
8. DhayalanP, Krishnasamy R, Periyasamy S, (2012), ‘In vitro Antioxidant and Preliminary Phytochemical Studies of Caralluma fimbriataWall.’, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 4(2),44-48
9. Azwandia N.N. (2015), A Review on the Extraction Methods used in Medicinal plants, Principle, Strength and Limitation, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants,4(1); 196
10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/coloumn_chromatoghraphy
Received on 04.06.2019 Modified on 25.06.2019
Accepted on 18.07.2019 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2019; 11(4):217-221.
DOI: 10.5958/0975-4385.2019.00037.2