Phytochemical Investigation of The Leaves Extract of The Plant Aquilaria malaccensis

 

Karunakar Hegde*, Avrin Romitha Lobo, Gopikrishna U V

Department of Pharmacology, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, Valachill, Post- Farangepete, Mangalore-574143, Karnataka, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: khegde_sh2003@yahoo.co.in

 

ABSTRACT:

From the petroleum ether extract of the leaves of Aquilaria malaccensis (Thymelaeaceae), five compounds namely stigmasterol, β-sitosterol, lupeol, ursolic acid and α-amyrin have been isolated by column chromatography. Their structures were characterized by m.p., IR, 1HNMR, 13CNMR and mass spectral data. However, the compounds stigmasterol, ursolic acid and α-amyrin were reported for the first time from this plant.

 

KEYWORDS: Aquilaria malaccensis, Leaves extract, Sterols, Triterpenoids.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Aquilaria malaccensis (Agar wood) belongs to the family Thymelaeaceae, locally known as Eagle wood distributed in India, Burma, Malaysia, Philippines and Indonesia. Agar wood leaves are reported to possess antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, antidepressant and antiviral activities1-3. They have a wide use in medicines like general pain reducer, kidney and rheumatic diseases, as a venom repellent and free radical scavenging properties. Further the agar wood leaves are reported to possess anticancer and radioprotective activities4,5. The extract of the leaves of agar wood is reported to contain more than a dozen chemical constituents belongs to steroids, flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids and glycosides class of secondary metabolites that can be extracted2. Since the chemical investigation of the leaves of Aquilaria malaccensis has not been dealt in detail, in the present study an effort was made to establish the chemical investigation of the extract of the leaves of this plant.

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chemicals and Instruments:

All the chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and procured from Ranbaxy Fine Chemicals Ltd., Mumbai, India. The melting points were determined in a Toshniwal melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. The IR spectra of the compounds were recorded using KBr pellet method on Rx-1 Perkin-Elmer FTIR. 1HNMR and 13CNMR spectra were run on Bruker Avance II 400 spectrophotometer using CDCl3 as a solvent. Mass spectra (FAB-MS) were obtained on a JEOL SX 102/DA-6000 mass spectrometer.

 

Plant Material:

The leaves of A. malaccensis were collected from the local areas and authenticated by Taxonomist. The collected leaf materials were cleaned, shade dried and stored in an air tight container.

 

Extraction and Isolation:

The coarse leaf powder (1000 g) were soaked in 1 L of 95% ethyl alcohol and extracted in the cold for 4 days with occasional shaking. After 4 days the ethanol layer was decanted off. The process was repeated for 4 times. The solvent from the total extract was filtered, the concentrate was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure and low temperature (40oC) on a rotary evaporator to give the ethanolic extract (16% w/w yield), which was stored at 4oC until use. The ethanol extract (100 g) was suspended in distilled water and then extraction with petroleum ether (60-80oC, 8x500 ml). All the fractions were then washed with distilled water (30 ml), dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and freed of solvent by distillation to give petroleum ether (60-80oC) soluble fraction (28 g). Petroleum ether fraction (25 g) was saponified by refluxing for 6 h in 500 ml 5% methanolic KOH and then allowed to stand at room temperature for 20 h. The unsaponifiable portion was then extracted with diethyl ether. All the ethereal fractions were combined and washed with distilled water. The solvent was evaporated and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate to afford a yellowish residue (8 g)6.

 

The residue (8 g) was dissolved in chloroform (10 ml) and adsorbed on to silica gel (60-120 mesh, 20 g). After evaporation of the solvent, it was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (150 g) prepared in n-hexane. The elutions carried out with n-hexane: ethyl acetate graded mixture (95:5) afforded compound I (60 mg) and n-hexane: ethyl acetate graded mixture (90:10) resulted into compound II (85 mg) and III (100 mg). Further, the elutions carried out with n-hexane: ethyl acetate graded mixtures (85:15) resulted into compound IV (85 mg) and V (80 mg) respectively. The individual compounds were purified by preparative TLC on silica gel G and further purified by recrystallization with n-hexane.

 

RESULTS:

Compound I (stigmasterol):

Pearl white crystals; Rf 0.63 in n-hexane: ethyl acetate (95:05); m.p. 167-170oC; IR vmax (KBr): 3423, 2952, 2850, 1668, 1619, 1465, 1070 cm-1; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.79, 0.78, 0.81, 0.91, 0.94, 1.08 (m, 18H), δ 1.13 to δ 2.53 (m, 18H, 9x CH2 and 8H), 3.54 (1H, dd, J= 9.1, 6.0 Hz, H-α3), 5.33 ( s, 1H, H-3), 5.11 and 5.15 (2H, br); 13CNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 33.79 (C-1), 26.48 (C-2), 778.98 (C-3), δ 40.57 (C-4), δ 145.83 (C-5), δ 121.81 (C-6), δ 32.50 (C-7), δ 35.35 (C-8), δ 45.99 (C-9), δ 35.95 (C-10), δ 21.19 (C-11), δ 38.93 (C-12), δ 51.32 (C-13), δ 30.02 (C-14), δ 37.33 (C-15), δ 32.08 (C-16), δ 56.93 (C-17), δ 18.36 (C-18), δ 19.91 (C-19), δ 50.23 (C-20), δ 18.61 (C -21), δ 138.39 (C-22), δ129.35 (C-23), δ 30.35 (C-24), δ 29.03 (C-25), δ 31.78 (C-26), δ 28.31 (C-27), δ 18.89 (C-28), δ 27.15 (C-29); FAB-MS m/z (rel.int): 412 [M+] (C29H48O) (100), 397 (20), 369 (10), 351 (70), 329 (65), 300 (40), 299 (23), 273 (31), 254 (28).

 

Compound II (β-sitosterol):

White crystals; Rf 0.36 in n-hexane: ethyl acetate (90:10); m.p. 138-140oC; IR vmax (KBr): 3454, 2940, 1643, 1461, 1374, 1045 cm-1; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.68 (s, 3H, Me-18), 0.82 (3H, d, J= 7.1 Hz, Me-27), 0.80 (3H, d, J= 7.1 Hz, Me-26), 0.85 (3H, m, Me-29), 0.91 (3H, d, J= 6.1 Hz, Me-21), 1.00 (s, 3H, Me-19), 3.51 (m, 1H, H-3a), 5.35 (1H, d, br, J=5.4 Hz, H-6); 13CNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 32.98 (C-1), 31.73 (C-2), 72.90 (C-3), 40.05 (C-4), 150.96 (C-5), 124.46 (C-6), 33.40 (C-7), 34.33 (C-8), 50.21 (C-9), 35.63 (C-10), 22.50 (C-11), 40.66 (C-12), 43.04 (C-13), 29.89 (C-14), 24.22 (C-15), 32.98 (C-16), 55.23 (C-17), 12.89 (C-18), 19.90 (C-19), 36.23 (C-20), 19.37 (C-21), 36.94 (C-22), 33.79 (C-23), 31.31 (C-24), 28.80 (C-25), 31.12 (C-26), 28.15 (C-27), 79.01 (C-28), 28.05 (C-29); FAB-MS m/z (rel.int): 414 [M+] (C29H50O) (50), 397 (100), 329 (9), 301 (5), 288 (15), 271 (15), 255 (22), 231(4), 199 (17), 161 (30), 147 (35), 133 (42), 105 (58), 91 (57), 81 (40).

 

Compound III (lupeol):

Pearl white crystals; Rf 0.56 in n-hexane: ethyl acetate (90:10); m.p. 213-215oC; IR vmax (KBr): 3436, 2928, 2852, 1649, 1455, 1374, 1038, 880 cm-1; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.76, 0.78, 0.82, 0.91, 0.94, 1.02 (m, 18H, Me-28, Me-23, Me-24, Me-25, Me-26, Me-27), 1.66 (3H, d, J= 0.7 Hz, Me-30), 3.21 (1H, dd, J= 9.5, 6.2 Hz, H-α3), 4.57 ( s, 1H, H-3), 4.69 (s, 1H), 4.83 (s, 1H); 13CNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 38.55 (C-1), 27.01 (C-2), 78.49 (C-3), 38.98 (C-4), 54.34 (C-5), 18.44 (C-6), 34.38 (C-7), 39.68 (C-8), 49.87 (C-9), 37.96 (C-10), 20.12 (C-11), 25.24 (C-12), 37.36 (C-13), 42.28 (C-14), 27.16 (C-15), 36.30 (C-16), 42.98 (C-17), 48.24 (C-18), 47.42 (C-19), 150.48 (C-20), 28.25 (C-21), 40.07 (C-22), 28.74 (C-23), 15.50 (C-24), 16.51 (C-25), 15.96 (C-26), 14.40 (C-27), 17.40 (C-28), 109.29 (C-29), 19.74 (C-30).; FAB-MS m/z (rel.int): 426 [M+] (C30H50O) (50), 409 (10), 395 (13), 318 (9), 218 (74), 203 (65), 187 (46), 175 (30), 161 (39), 147 (64), 125 (71), 121 (70), 93 (100).

 

Compound IV (ursolic acid):

Pale yellow powder; Rf 0.51 in n-hexane: ethyl acetate (85:15); m.p. 271-274oC; IR vmax (KBr): 3453, 2926, 2854, 1636, 1458, 1381, 1034 cm-1; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 1.00 to 1.91 (m, 22H), 3.20 (1H, dd, J= 10, 5.7 Hz, H-3), 2.17 (1H, d, J= 4.52 Hz, H-18), 1.03 (s, 3H, Me-23), 0.92 (s, 3H, Me-24), 0.77 (s, 3H, Me-25), 0.94 (s, 3H, Me-26), 0.95 (s, 3H, Me-27), 0.87 (s, 3H, Me-29), 0.84 (s, 3H, Me-30), 2.28 (m, 1H, OH), 5.34 (s, 1H, H-12); 13CNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 37.30 (C-1), 28.19 (C-2), 78.49 (C-3), 39.98 (C-4), 41.18 (C-5), 22.87 (C-6), 29.25 (C-7), 39.05 (C-8), 51.87 (C-9), 30.32 (C-10), 22.59 (C-11), 125.25 (C-12), 137.48 (C-13), 39.38 (C-14), 29.25 (C-15), 26.16 (C-16), 55.39 (C-17), 38.95 (C-18), 32.54 (C-19), 37.30 (C-20), 27.91 (C-21), 38.06 (C-22), 14.92 (C-23), 14.20 (C-24), 18.45 (C-25), 16.95 (C-26), 23.69 (C-27), 177.48 (C-28), 20.12 (C-29), 16.16 (C-30); FAB-MS m/z (rel.int): 456 [M+] (C30H48O3) (71), 428 (50), 289 (49), 277 (35), 248 (100), 149 (27), 85 (11), 83 (44).

Compound V (α-amyrin):

White crystals; Rf 0.62 in n-hexane: ethyl acetate (85:15); m.p. 179-181oC; IR vmax (KBr): 3444, 2948, 2891, 1639, 1451, 1384 cm-1; 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 0.80 (s, 3H, Me-24), 0.88 (s, 6H, Me-29, Me-30), 0.89 (s, 3H, Me-28), 0.99 (s, 3H, Me-23), 0.95 (s, 3H, Me-25), 1.08 (s, 3H, Me-26), 1.16 (s, 3H, Me-27), 3.85 (m, 1H, H-3a), 5.35 (1H, t, J= 3.4 Hz, H-12); 13CNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 38.95 (C-1), 27.51 (C-2), 78.41 (C-3), 38.95 (C-4), 55.34 (C-5), 18.40 (C-6), 33.24 (C-7), 40.07 (C-8), 47.42 (C-9), 36.96 (C-10), 23.63 (C-11), 124.28 (C-12), 138.48 (C-13), 42.28 (C-14), 26.16 (C-15), 28.16 (C-16), 33.88 (C-17), 59.22 (C-18), 39.68 (C-19), 39.38 (C-20), 31.32 (C-21), 41.58 (C-22), 28.25 (C-23), 15.20 (C-24), 15.56 (C-25), 16.91 (C-26), 23.27 (C-27), 28.74 (C-28), 18.40 (C-29), 21.46 (C-30); FAB-MS m/z (rel.int): 426 [M+] (C30H50O) (70), 393 (50), 218 (47), 207 (70), 203 (45), 189 (66).

 

 

Stigmasteral

 

 

β-sitosterol

 

 

Lupeol

 

Ursolic acid

 

α-amyrin

 

DISCUSSION:

Compound I was obtained as pearl white crystals and gave characteristic color reaction for sterol. The FAB-MS spectrum showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 412 corresponding to molecular formula C29H48O. The IR spectrum exhibited strong absorptions at 3423 cm-1 (hydroxyl group), 2952 and 1668 cm-1. The 1HNMR spectrum exhibited six tertiary methyl groups at δ 0.79, 0.78, 0.82, 0.91, 0.94, and 1.08, one vinylic proton at δ 5.33 and two olefinic protons at δ 5.11 and 5.15 respectively. In 13CNMR spectrum the most down field signals at δ 145.83 was accommodated for sp2 (olefinic) carbon at C-5 and the next downfield signal at δ 138.39 ppm and δ 129.35 ppm to C-22 and C-23. The downfield signal at δ 121.81 is to C-6. The oxygenated carbon at C-3 gave a downfield signal at δ 78.98 ppm. The next downfield signal at δ 56.93 ppm was accommodated for C-17. Other carbon atoms of the steroidal skeleton except that in the side chain appeared in the range δ 45.99 to δ 30.02 ppm. The angular methyl groups and the side chain methyl carbons gave signals in the region δ 19.91 to δ 18.89 ppm. 13CNMR spectral data matched exactly with that of Stigmasterol7. Its identity as stigmasterol was confirmed by m.p., IR, 1HNMR, 13CNMR and mass spectral data and by co-chromatography with an authentic sample.

 

Compound II obtained as white crystals and it gave characteristic color reaction for sterol. The FAB-MS spectrum showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 414 corresponding to molecular formula C29H50O. The most downfield signals at d 150.96 (C-5) was accommodated for sp2 (olefinic) and the next downfield signal at d 124.46 (C-6). The oxygenated carbon at C-3 gave a down field signal at d 72.90. The next downfield d 55.23 was accommodated for C-17. 13CNMR spectral data matched exactly with that of b-sitosterol11. Its identity as b-sitosterol was further confirmed by IR, 1HNMR spectral properties identical to those described for b-sitosterol8.

 

Compound III was obtained as pearl white crystals and it gave characteristic color reaction for triterpenoids. The FAB-MS spectrum showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 426 corresponding to molecular formula C30H50O. The IR spectrum exhibited strong absorptions at 3436 cm-1 (hydroxyl group) and 2928, 1649, 880 cm-1 (exomethylene group). The 1HNMR spectrum exhibited six tertiary methyl groups at δ 0.76, 0.78, 0.82, 0.91, 0.94 and 1.02, a methane group at δ 1.66, a secondary carbinol group at δ 3.21 and an exomethylene group at δ 4.56 and 4.68 implies a typical pentacyclic triterpenoid of the lupeol. Based on the m.p., IR, 1HNMR, 13CNMR and mass spectral data the compound was identified as lupeol9,10.

 

Compound IV was obtained as pale yellow powder and it gave characteristic color reaction for triterpenoids. The FAB-MS showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 456 corresponding to a molecular formula C30H48O3. It was unambiguously identified as ursolic acid on the basis of its m.p., IR, 1HNMR, 13CNMR and mass spectral data11.

 

Compound V obtained as white crystals; it gave characteristic color reaction for triterpenoids. FAB-MS spectrum displayed the molecular ion peak at m/z 426 [M+] corresponding to the molecular formula (C30H50O). The IR spectrum exhibited strong absorption at 3444 cm-1 (OH), 2948 cm-1 (C-H), 2891 cm-1 (C-H), 1639 cm-1 (C=C). The 1HNMR spectrum of this compound exhibited the presence of methyl group at δ 0.80 (H-24), δ 0.88 (H-29, 30), δ 0.89 (H-28), δ 0.95 (H-25), δ 0.99 (H-23), δ 1.08 (H-26), δ 1.16 (H-27) and HC-OH at δ 3.85 (H-3) and 5.35 (H-12). The 13CNMR spectrum revealed 30 signals which were duly assigned as CH3, CH2, CH, -C- group represent in the compound. Based on the IR, 1HNMR and 13NMR and MS spectral data, the compound was identified as α-amyrin12.

 

CONCLUSION:

From the spectral data, the compounds I-V was analyzed as stigmasterol, b-sitosterol lupeol, ursolic acid and α-amyrin respectively. However, the compounds stigmasterol, ursolic acid and α-amyrin were reported for the first time from this plant.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are thankful to the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bangalore for financial assistance to this work.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Khalil AS, Rahim AA, Taha KK, Abdallah, KB. Characterization of Methanolic Extracts of Agar wood Leaves. J Appl Ind Sci. 2013;1(3):78-88.

2.      Sannigrahi S, Mazuder UK, Parida S, Jain S. Antioxidant potential of crude extract and different fractions of Enhydra Fluctuans Lour. Iranian J Pharma Res. 2010;9(1):75-8.

3.      Agrawal PK Carbon-13NMR of flavonoids. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1989.

4.      Karunakar Hegde, Fathima Jazeela M A, Vijetha Poojary K, Satish S. Anti-cancer potentials of the plant Aquilaria malaccensis leaves. Indian J Pharmacy Pharmacol. 2018;5(3):135-40.

5.      Karunakar Hegde, Manisha Mascarenhas J A, Rohan Joseph D Silva. Radio protective activity of the plant Aquilaria malaccensis leaves. Am J PharmTech Res. 2018; 8(6):240-8.

6.      Pearlman WH, Emily C. The isolation of C21 steroids from human placenta, J Biol Chem. 1951;8:807-14.

7.      Sright JLC, McInnes AG, Shimizu S, Smith DG, Walter JA, Idler D, Khalil W. Identification of C-24 alkyl epimers of marine sterols by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Can J Chem. 1978;56:1898-903.

8.      Usmanghani K, et al. Chemical constituents of medicinal plant Oldenlandia retrorsa Boiss. Sci Pharm. 1983;51:403-5.

9.      Gunasekera SP, Cordell GA, Farnsworth NR. Constituents of Pithecellobium multiflorum, J Nat Prod. 1982; 45:651-4.

10.   Garcia B, Alberto Macro J, Seoane E, Tortajada A. Triterpinoids, waxes and tricin in Phoenix canariensis. J Nat Prod. 1981;44:111-3.

11.   Saeidnia S, Gohari AR, Uchiyama N, Ito M, Honda G, Kiuchi F. Tow new monoterpene glycosides and trypanocidal terpenoids from Dracocephalum kotschyi. Chem Pharm Bull. 2004;52:1249-50.

12.   Sica D, Piccialli V and Masullo A. Configuration at C-24 of sterols from the marine phanerogames Posidonia oceanica and Cymodoceanodosa. Phytochem. 1984;23:2609-11.

 

 

 

 

Received on 28.12.2018         Modified on 13.01.2019

Accepted on 25.01.2019  ©A&V Publications All right reserved

Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2019; 11(1): 34-37.

DOI: 10.5958/0975-4385.2019.00007.4