Pharmacological Studies on Flowers of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa and lushii (Grah.) Hook. F from Thar Desert of Rajasthan, India
Sunita Arora*, Sonam Meena1
*Professor, Department of Botany, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur (Raj.), India
1Research Scholar, Department of Botany, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur (Raj.), India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: jnvusunitarora@gmail.com, meenasonam27@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Objective: Plants synthesize organic compounds continuously to play an important role in maintenance of human health. The characterization of floral chemical constituents of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa and var. lushii was done using GC-MS technique. Methods: Flowers were collected from typical xeric conditions of Indian Thar Desert of Rajasthan, during the month of August-October. The phytochemical compounds were investigated using Perkin-Elmer gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, while the mass spectra of the compounds found in the extract were matched with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Willey 2008 library. Results: Maximum % area is found for 24-Norursa-3,12-diene, is present in maximum amount (41.94%) with retention time (RT) =43.658 minutes, followed by Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (8.72%) with RT=28.029 minutes in the methanolic extract. Pentacosane is present in maximum amount (39.52%) with retention time (RT)=26.585 minutes, followed by Tetracontane (34.28%) with RT=28.656 minutes in the chloroform extract of flowers of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa. Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester is present in maximum amount (26.25%) with retention time (RT) =28.039 minutes, followed by Octadecanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester (12.39%) with RT=30.181 minutes in the methanolic extract. Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester is present in maximum amount (40.39%) with retention time (RT)=28.139 minutes, followed by Octadecanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester (24.49%) with RT=30.237 minutes in the chloroform extract of flowers of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. lushii. Conclusion: The floral extract of Ceropegia species using methanol and chloroform as a solvent could isolate individual components from mass spectra of the constituents. The isolated bioactive floral phytocomponents of this plant could play an important role in development of new medicine and noval drugs to prevent and treat various diseases or aliments.
KEYWORDS: Asclepiadaceae, Ceropegia species, Chloroform, GC-MS, Medicinal plants, Methanol, Phytochemical constituents, Secondary metabolites.
INTRODUCTION:
Plants are sources of bioactive compounds and they continue to play an important role in human health[1]. India is the largest producer of medicinal herbs and is appropriately called the botanical garden of the world[2]. Medicinal plants have occupied an important position in the socio-cultural, development of rural people of India. Plants and leaves are considered as one of the main sources of biologically active compounds, even today compound from plants continue to play a major role in primary health care as therapeutic remedies in many developing countries [3]. Herbal medicines are safer than synthetic medicines because the phytochemicals in the plant extract target the biochemical pathway. Medicinal plants have been used all over the world for the treatment and prevention of various ailments, particularly in developing countries where infectious diseases are endemic and modern health facilities and services are inadequate[4]. Kumarasingha etal.,[5] reported that natural compounds from plants provide a prospect in the search for new drugs which are effective, safe and with better pharmacological action than the synthetic drugs. Several compounds, found and isolated from various plants have shown biological properties such as anticancer, anthelmintic, analgesic, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiviral and many other to a lesser or greater extent[6,7]. The bioactive constituents of medicinal plants can be extracted with different methods and then subjected to evaluation. There are reports of significant differences in physiological activities of plant extracts which depends upon the extraction methods and it emphasizes the importance of choosing an appropriate extraction method for a specific purpose[8]. The phytochemicals in plants greatly determine the antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory capacity primarily due to their redox properties [9] which are important in adsorbing and scavenging of free radicals [10].
Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. (Asclepiadaceae) is a threatened medicinal plant distributed in various habitats in semi-arid region of Thar Desert of Rajasthan, India [11]. They are usally tuberiferous erect herb and climber, generally grows in comparatively drier parts of the country, shows slight succulence and featured C4 photosynthesis [12]. Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa and var. lushii (Grah.) Hook.f. is perennial, twining, herb of sandy substratum, bearing tubers, needs support of other xerophytic bushes/ shrubs. Two varieties are found locally, the broad leaved variety is known as Ceropegia bulbosa var. bulbosa and the variety having thin and long leaves is known as Ceropegia bulbosa var. lushii [13]. Tuberous root of the plant is edible and contains a pyridine alkaloid cerpegin [14]. Previous reports revealed that it cures cough and cold [15], gastrointestinal problems [16], Scorpion bite, fertility and viability [17], diarrhea and dysentery [18] and urinary disorders [19,20,21].
The plants based phytochemicals are chemical compounds formed during the normal metabolic processes. These chemicals are often referred to as “Secondary metabolites”[22]. The secondary metabolites are a significant source with a variety of structural arrangements and properties[23]. In recent years Gas Chromatography- Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) studies have been increasingly applied to analyze secondary metabolites present in the medicinal plants as this technique has been proved to be a best valuable method for the analysis of essential oil, alcohols, acids, esters, alkaloids, steroids, amino, nitro compounds etc.[24,25]. Interpretation on mass spectrum was conducted using the database of National Institute Standard and Technology (NIST) having more than 62,000 patterns. The spectrum of the unknown component was compared with the spectrum of the known components stored in the NIST library [26]. In present study methanol and chloroform extract of flowers of both variety of Ceropegia bulbosa were analyzed by using GC-MS technique to isolate and characterize the bioactive phytochemical constituents from flowers.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Collection and extraction of plant material:
Fresh flowers of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa and var. lushii. were collected from typical xeric condition of Indian Thar Desert of Rajasthan, during the month of August-October. The specimen authentication and botanical identification was done by Botanical Survey of India, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. The flowers were thoroughly washed with tap water followed by distilled water, dried under shade for 20 days and ground into fine powder. After sieving the powder was transferred to airtight polyethylene zipper bags, labeled and stored till further use. 2g of coarse powder was transferred to round bottom flask. 200 ml of solvent was added to each flask containing crude powerded plant material. Hot extraction method using soxhlet apparatus was followed with methanol and chloroform as solvent. The solution was then boiled at 60-70º C for 18 hours on water bath, filtered, evaporated to dryness, & final residue was then subjected to GC-MS analysis that was performed at Advanced Instrumentation Research Facility (AIRF), Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India using a GC-MS model; QP 2010 ultra-series, Shimadzu, Tokyo (Japan), equipped with thermal desorption system TD 20. Injection Mode: Split, Flow Control Mode: Linear Velocity, Pressure: 81.9 kPa, Linear Velocity:40.5 cm/sec, Purge Flow: 3.0 mL/min, Split Ratio: 50.0. For GC-MS detection [GC-2010], electron ionization system with ionizing energy of 70ev was used. Helium gas (99.99%) was used as the carrier gas at constant flow rate of 1ml/min in the split mode (10:1) and an injection volume of 2 μl of chloroform solution of different plant part sample was injected into the column with the injector temperature 260ºC, ion-source temperature 230ºC. column oven temperature was maintained at 80 ºC, Pressure was maintained at 81.9 kPa. Equilibrium time was 0.5 min. start m/z ratio was 40.00 and it ended at 650.00. The relative % amount of each component was calculated by comparing its average peak area to the total area, software adopted to handle mass spectra and chromatograms was a Turbomass. The relative percentage of the each extract constituents was expressed as percentage with peak area.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Herbal medicine represents one of the most important fields of traditional medicine worldwide. Various extracts from traditional medicinal plants have been tested to identify the source of the therapeutic effects. Significance of employing bioactive compounds in pharmacy to produce drugs for the treatment of many diseases requires purification of compounds [27]. Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. is medicinally more important but it is endangered [28,29].
GC-MS chromatogram of the methanolic and chloroform extract of flowers of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa showed 66 and 42 peaks (Fig. 1) indicating the presence of 31 and 11 compounds respectively and flowers of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. lushii showed 39 and 35 peaks (Fig. 2) indicating the presence of 25 and 15 compounds respectively. Confirmation of their presence was based on retention time (RT), peak area, molecular formula, concentration (%), and molecular weight (Tables 1,2,3 & 4).
24-Norursa-3,12-diene is present in maximum amount (41.94%) with retention time (RT) =43.658 minutes, followed by Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (8.72%) with RT=28.029 minutes and L-Proline, Ethylester is present in minimum amount (0.07%) with RT=16.510 minutes followed by 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- (0.10%) with RT=23.617 minutes in the methanolic extract. Pentacosane is present in maximum amount (39.52%) with retention time (RT)=26.585 minutes, followed by Tetracontane (34.28%) with RT=28.656 minutes and 1-Butanol, 3-methyl-, carbonate (2:1) is present in minimum amount (0.10%) with RT=30.480 minutes, followed by Dodecanoic acid, 1,1-dimethylpropyl ester (0.16%) with RT= 31.217 minutes in the chloroform extract of flowers of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa.
Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester is present in maximum amount (26.25%) with retention time (RT) =28.039 minutes, followed by Octadecanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester (12.39%) with RT=30.181 minutes and Glycidyl palmitate is present in minimum amount (0.17%) with RT=25.422 minutes, followed by 2-Dodecanone (0.21%) with RT=11.775 minutes in the methanolic extract. Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester is present in maximum amount (40.39%) with retention time (RT)=28.139 minutes, followed by Octadecanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester (24.49%) with RT=30.237 minutes and 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester is present in minimum amount (0.16%) with RT=20.317 minutes, followed by 9-Octadecenamide (0.17%) with RT=30.665 minutes in the chloroform extract of flowers of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. lushii.
The gas chromatogram shows the relative concentrations of various compounds getting eluted as a function of retention time. The peak indicates relative concentration of the components present in the extract. The mass spectrometer analyzes the compounds eluted at different time that identify the nature and structure of the compounds. The large fraction gets dissected into smaller compounds giving rise to appearance of peaks at different m/z (mass to charge) ratio. These mass spectra are fingerprint of that compounds which can be identified from the data library. Methanol is proved to be better solvents as compared to chloroform as it could extract more biologically active compounds. Potent solvents are always better tools for perfect and synchronized extraction.
Figure 1. GC-MS chromatogram of the flower extract of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa in (a) methanol and (b) chloform
Figure 2. GC-MS chromatogram of the flower extract of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. lushii in (a) methanol and (b) chloform
Table 1. Bio-active compounds in the methanolic extract of flower of Ceropegia bulosa Roxb. var. bulbosa
|
S. No. |
RT (min) |
Compound Name |
Area % |
Biological Activity |
|
1 |
9.931 |
Naphthalene |
1.38 |
Antiseptic, Carcinogenic |
|
2 |
11.772 |
2- Undecanone |
0.17 |
Animicrobial activity |
|
3 |
13.477 |
1-Tetradecene |
1.98 |
Anti-tuberculosis |
|
4 |
13.607 |
Tetratetracontane |
0.26 |
Hypoglycaemic, Antioxidant |
|
5 |
16.556 |
Diethyl phthalate |
0.32 |
Estrogenic activity, Antimicrobial, Plasticizer, Antioxidant |
|
6 |
16.620 |
1-Hexadecene |
2.62 |
Antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant |
|
7 |
16.731 |
Hexadecane |
0.14 |
Antifungal, Antibacterial and antioxidant activities |
|
8 |
17.254 |
Benzophenone |
0.35 |
Antifungal, Anti-HIV, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, Antiviral and Cytotoxic |
|
9 |
17.764 |
8-Pentadecanone |
0.83 |
Heptatoxic, Demyelination, Conjunctivitis activity |
|
10 |
18.980 |
Tetradecanoic acid |
0.18 |
Antioxidant, Cancer preventive, Nematicide, Lybricant, Hypocholesterolemic |
|
11 |
19.442 |
1-Octadecene |
1.67 |
Finishing agent, Intermediates, Lubricants and Lubricant additives |
|
12 |
20.318 |
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-Methylpropyl)ester |
0.74 |
Antimicrobial, antifouling |
|
13 |
20.490 |
8-Octadecanone |
1.04 |
Antimicrobial activity |
|
14 |
21.137 |
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester |
1.36 |
Antioxidant, hypocholesterolenic, antiandrogenic, flavour, nematicide, hemolytic5-alpha reductaee inhibitor |
|
15 |
21.525 |
Dibutyl phthalate |
0.37 |
Antimicrobial, Antifungal, Antimalarial, Plasticizer, Ectoparaciticide |
|
16 |
21.589 |
n-Hexadecanoic acid |
2.30 |
Antifungal, Antioxidant, Hypocholesterolemic Nematicide, Anti-Androgenic Flavour, Haemolytic 5-Alphareductase Inhibitor, Potent Antimicrobial Agent, Antimalarial And Antifungal |
|
17 |
21.997 |
n-Tetracosanol-1 |
0.95 |
Anti-bacterial, Anticancer, Anti-oxidant, lowering cholesterol, inhibiting lipid peroxidation, enhancing immune functions, inhibits platelet aggregation, cardiovascular |
|
18 |
22.964 |
10-Nonadecanone |
0.25 |
Anticancer activity |
|
19 |
23.168 |
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (z,z)-,methyl ester |
0.45 |
Hepatoprotective,anti-histaminic, Antieczemic, Hypocholesterolemic |
|
20 |
23.550 |
Methyl stearate |
0.78 |
Anti-diarrheal, cytotoxic and antiproliferative activity |
|
21 |
23.617 |
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- |
0.10 |
Cancer preventive, Insectifuge, Anti-inflammatory, Nematicide, Hepatoprotective, Antihistaminic, Anticane, Antiarthritic, Antieczemic |
|
22 |
23.689 |
Cis-9-Hexadecenal |
0.30 |
Antimicrobial |
|
23 |
23.959 |
Octadecanoic acid |
0.35 |
Antibacterial action, Cosmetic, Flavor, Hypocholestrolemic, Lubricant, perfumery, Propecic, Suppository |
|
24 |
27.747 |
1H-Indene, 1-hexadecyl-2,3- dihydro- |
1.52 |
Anticancer activity |
|
25 |
28.029 |
Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester |
8.72 |
Antioxidant |
|
26 |
28.274 |
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid |
0.61 |
Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Antifouling activity |
|
27 |
30.182 |
Octadecanoic acid, 2,3- dihydroxypropyl ester |
3.96 |
Anticancer, Antimicrobial |
|
28 |
31.549 |
1-Heptacosanol |
0.42 |
Nematicidal , anticancer, antioxidant and antimicrobial |
|
29 |
34.598 |
Ergost-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.,24R)- |
2.64 |
Liver disease, jaundice, Artherosclerosis |
|
30 |
34.883 |
Stigmasterol |
2.78 |
Antimicrobial activity |
Table 2. Bio-active compounds in the chloroform extract of flowerof Ceropegia bulosa Roxb. var. bulbosa
|
S. No. |
RT (min) |
Compound Name |
Area % |
Biological Activity |
|
1. |
20.928 |
7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro(4,5)deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione |
2.03 |
Antimicrobial activity |
|
2. |
21.586 |
n-Hexadecanoic acid |
0.97 |
Antifungal, Antioxidant, Hypocholesterolemic Nematicide, Anti-Androgenic Flavour, Haemolytic 5-Alphareductase Inhibitor, Potent Antimicrobial Agent, Antimalarial And Antifungal |
|
3. |
23.257 |
Heneicosane |
4.97 |
Anibacterial, Oviposition attractant pheromone |
|
4. |
26.585 |
Pentacosane |
39.52 |
Antibacterial activity |
|
5. |
28.656 |
Tetracontane |
34.28 |
Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic activity |
|
6. |
29.678 |
Tetratriacontane |
0.55 |
Antibacterial and Antifungal |
|
7. |
30.670 |
9-Octadecenamide |
0.57 |
Good therapeutic agent for the treatment of sleep disorders and pain |
|
8. |
32.001 |
Hexatriacontane |
0.41 |
Free Radical scavenging |
|
9. |
33.215 |
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.)- |
0.55 |
Anti-inflammatory, Anti-pyretic, Anti-ulcer, Antiarthritic |
|
10. |
35.643 |
.gamma.- Sitosterol |
3.28 |
Hupolipidemic property |
|
11. |
39.527 |
5,11,17,23-Tetratert-butylpentacyclo(19.3.1.1(3,7).1(9,13).1(15,19))octacosa-1(25),3(28),4,6,9(27),10,12,15(26),16,18,21,23-dodecaene-25,26,27,28-tetrol |
3.53 |
Membrane carriers for the transport of chiral amino acids used as extractants, transporters and optical sensors |
Table 3. Bio-active compounds in the methanolic extract of flower of Ceropegia bulosa Roxb. var. lishii
|
S. No. |
RT (min) |
Compound Name |
Area % |
Biological Activity |
|
1. |
9.934 |
Naphthalene |
1.71 |
Antiseptic, Carcinogenic |
|
2. |
13.476 |
1-Tetradecene |
2.45 |
Anti- tuberculosis activity |
|
3. |
16.618 |
1-Hexadecene |
3.12 |
Antibacterial, Antifungal, Antioxidant |
|
4. |
17.762 |
8-Pentadecanone |
0.82 |
Heptatoxic, Demyelination, Conjunctivitis activity |
|
5. |
19.439 |
1-Octadecene |
1.89 |
Finishing agent, Intermediates, Lubricants and Lubricant additives |
|
6. |
20.316 |
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester |
0.65 |
Antimicrobial activity, alpha- Glucosidase inhibition and the in vitro hypoglycemic effect |
|
7. |
20.488 |
8-Octadecanone |
0.92 |
Antimicrobial activity |
|
8. |
21.136 |
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester |
6.98 |
Antibacterial and Antifungal, Antioxidant Hypocholesterolemic, Nematicide, Insecticide Lubricant, Antiandrogenic Flavor, Hemolytic |
|
9. |
21.521 |
Dibutyl phthalate |
0.61 |
Antifungal, antimicrobial, anti-malarial, plasticizer and ectoparasiticide |
|
10. |
21.591 |
n-Hexadecanoic acid |
0.61 |
Antifungal, Antioxidant, Hypocholesterolemic Nematicide, Anti-Androgenic Flavour, Haemolytic 5-Alphareductase Inhibitor, Potent Antimicrobial Agent, Antimalarial And Antifungal |
|
11. |
22.960 |
10-Nonadecanone |
0.26 |
Anticancer activity |
|
12. |
23.164 |
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (z,z)-, methyl ester |
0.81 |
Hepatoprotective,anti-histaminic, Antieczemic, Hypocholesterolemic, |
|
13. |
23.548 |
Methyl stearate |
4.20 |
Anti-diarrheal, cytotoxic and antiproliferative activity |
|
14. |
27.745 |
1H-Indene, 1-hexadecyl-2,3- dihydro- |
5.02 |
Anticancer activity |
|
15. |
28.039 |
Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester |
26.25 |
Antioxidant |
|
16. |
28.272 |
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid |
1.41 |
Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Antifouling activity |
|
17. |
29.062 |
Docosane |
0.25 |
Antibacterial activity |
|
18. |
29.785 |
1H-Indole-3-Ethanamine |
1.78 |
Used in Neurotransmitter & psychedelics |
|
19. |
30.181 |
Octadecanoic acid, 2,3- dihydroxypropyl ester |
12.39 |
Anticancer, Antimicrobial |
|
20. |
30.807 |
Tetracontane |
0.37 |
Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic activity |
|
21. |
34.591 |
Ergost-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.,24R)- |
1.54 |
Liver disease, jaundice, Artherosclerosis |
|
22. |
34.882 |
Stigmasterol |
1.76 |
Antimicrobial activity |
|
23. |
35.632 |
.gamma.- Sitosterol |
3.54 |
Hupolipidemic property |
|
24. |
43.186 |
Methyl commate A |
7.98 |
Anthelmintic effect |
Table 4. Bio-active compounds in the chloroform extract of flower of Ceropegia bulosa Roxb. var. lishii
|
S. No. |
RT (min) |
Compound Name |
Area % |
Biological Activity |
|
1
|
20.317 |
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester |
0.16 |
Antimicrobial activity, alpha- Glucosidase inhibition and the in vitro hypoglycemic effect |
|
2
|
20.933 |
7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro(4,5)deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione |
1.47 |
Antimicrobial activity |
|
3
|
21.599 |
I-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6- dihexadecanoate |
0.29 |
Anti-pigmentation effect |
|
4 |
23.257 |
Heneicosane |
1.63 |
Anibacterial, Oviposition attractant pheromone |
|
5
|
26.585 |
Pentacosane |
13.20 |
Antibacterial activity |
|
6
|
28.139 |
Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester |
40.39 |
Antioxidant |
|
7 |
28.304 |
Bis (2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate |
0.99 |
Antimicrobial, Plasticizer |
|
8 |
29.680 |
Tetratriacontane |
0.29 |
Antibacterial and Antifungal |
|
9
|
30.237 |
Octadecanoic acid, 2,3- dihydroxypropyl ester |
24.49 |
Anticancer, Antimicrobial |
|
10 |
30.529 |
Tetratetracontane |
0.35 |
Antioxidant, Hypoglycemic |
|
11 |
30.665 |
9-Octadecenamide |
0.17 |
Good therapeutic agent for the treatment of sleep disorders and pain |
|
12 |
30.816 |
Tetracontane |
8.81 |
Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic activity |
|
13 |
32.002 |
Hexatriacontane |
0.30 |
Free Radical scavenging |
|
14 |
35.645 |
.gamma.- Sitosterol |
0.57 |
Hupolipidemic property |
|
15
|
39.535 |
5,11,17,23-Tetratert-butylpentacyclo(19.3.1.1(3,7).1(9,13).1(15,19))octacosa-1(25),3(28),4,6,9(27),10,12,15(26),16,18,21,23-dodecaene-25,26,27,28-tetrol |
3.58 |
Membrane carriers for the transport of chiral amino acids used as extractants, transporters and optical sensors |
CONCLUSION:
GC-MS technique is a fast and direct analytical approach for isolation and identification of bioactive compounds and only few grams of plant material is required. The technique of fingerprint could really identify the false herbal products. The construction of chromatographic fingerprints aims at evaluating the quality of herbal medicines [30].We are first to report the presence of some important bioactive chemical constituents from flowers of this plant using GC-MS technique. Extraction of valuable biological compounds from flowers can open new era for pharmaceutics and drug design companies. Apart from this other trials are required before practical applications and the plant also need proper conservation strategies as it is being endangered.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Authors express sincere thanks to Prof. P.K. Kasera for providing academic support and the CAS Department of Botany J.N.V. University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan) for providing research facilities, infrastructure and technical support. I am also thankful to University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi for providing financial support.
REFERENCES:
1. Sermakkani M and Thangapandian V. GC-MS analysis of Сassia italica leaf methanol extract. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2012; 5(2): 90-94.
2. Ahmedull M and Nayar MP. Red Data Book for Indian plants. Botanical Survey of India. 1999; pp. 4.
3. Bobbarala et al. Evaluation of hydroxyl radical scavenging activity and HPTLC fingerprint profiling of Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa extracts. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2011; 4 (1): 252-255.
4. Zaidan et al. In vitro screening of five local medicinal plants for antibacterial activity using disc diffusion method. Tropical Biomedicine. 2005; 22: 165-170.
5. Kumarasingha et al. Anthelmintic activity of selected ethnomedicinal plant extracts on parasitic stages of Haemonchus contortus. Parasites & Vectors. 2016; 9(1): 187.
6. Cai et al. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sciences. 2004; 74(17): 2157-2184.
7. Miliauskas et al. Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts. Food Chemistry. 2004; 85(2): 231-237
8. Do QD et al. Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content, total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2014; 22(3): 296-302.
9. Zheng W and Wang SY. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001; 49(11): 5165-70.
10. Adedapo et al. Antibacterial and antioxidant properties of the methanol extracts of the leaves and stems of Calpurnia aurea. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2008; 8(1): 53.
11. Walter J and Gillet J. IUCN Red list of threatened plants. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK. 1998.
12. Ziegler et al. The photosynthetic pathway types of some desert plants from India, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Iran. Oecologia. 1981; 48: 93-99.
13. Arora S and Meena S. Qualitative phytochemical screening and GC-MS analysis of Sarcostemma viminale (L.) R.Br., an endangered plant from thar desert. Advances in Plant Sciences. 2016; 29(2): 279-282.
14. Mabberley DJ. The Plant Book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1978.
15. Tintisara MP. Traditional uses of plants by the tribals in bhiloda (e) forest range of district sabarkantha, gujarat. Life Sciences Leaflets. 2013; 47: 15-19.
16. Kumar P. The Economics of Medicinal Plants: Are High Commercial Values Enough to Ensure Biodiversity Conservation. In Miththapala S (ed). Conserving medicinal species: securing a healthy future. IUCN: Ecosystems and Livelihoods Group, Asia. 2006; pp. 9-15.
17. Meena AK and Rao MM. Folk herbal medicines used by the meena community in Rajasthan. Asian Journal of Traditional Medicines. 2010; 5(1): 19-31.
18. Kumar RB and Suryanarayana B. Ethnomedicinal recipes for digestive ailments and stomachic problems & allied diseases from tribals of Sriharikota Island, Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2014; 5(1): 468-482.
19. Shweta S and Katewa SS. Ethnobotanical observation on tuberous plants from tribal area of Rajasthan (India). Ethnobotanical Leaflets. 2008; 12: 647-66.
20. Sharma et al. Study of medicinal plants in aravali regions of Rajasthan for treatment of kidney stone and urinary tract troubles. International Journal of PharmTech Research. 2011; 3(1): 110-113.
21. Khan MA and Pradhan D. Antiurolithc activity of Ceropegia bulbosa extract in rats. Der Pharmacia Sinica. 2012; 3(1): 148-152.
22. Mithraja et al. Chemical diversity analysis on some selected medicinally important pteridophytes of western ghats, India. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2012; 34-39.
23. Vanitha et al. Determination of bioactive components of Annona squamosa L. leaf by GC-MS analysis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research. 2011; 3(4): 309-12.
24. Muthulakshmi et al. GC-MS analysis of bioactive components of Feronia elephantum correa (Rutaceae). Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2012; 2: 69-74.
25. Konovalova et al. GC-MS analysis of Shpherdia argentea (Pursh.) Nutt. from Ukraineen flora. The Pharma Journal. 2013; 2(6): 7-12.
26. Ammal RM and Stella Bai GV. GC-MS determination of bioactive constituents of Heliotropium indicum leaf. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies. 2013; 1(6): 30-33.
27. Hammed et al. Analysis of bioactive chemical compounds of Aspergillus niger by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy. 2015; 7(8): 132-63.
28. Arora S and Meena S. Pharmagnostic potentialities of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. lushii (Grah.) Hook.F.: An endangered plant from thar desert, Rajasthan, India. International Reserach Journal of Pharmacy. 2017; 8 (6): 77-82.
29. Arora S and Meena S. Analysis of bioactive constituents from Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. Var. Bulbosa: An endangered medicinal plant from thar desert of Rajasthan, India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018; 7(1): 2242-2247.
30. Yi-Zeng et al. Quality control of herbal medicines. Journal of Chromatography B. 2004; 812: 53-70.
Received on 04.03.2018 Modified on 13.04.2018
Accepted on 10.05.2018 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2018; 10(3): 226-232.
DOI: 10.5958/0975-4385.2018.00037.7