Genetic Transformation of Plants: Introduction and Recent Advances

 

Dr. Shoaib Ahmad

University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rayat-Bahra University, Mohali 140104 India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: shoaibahmad1999@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

Gram-negative soil bacteria belonging to the Genus Agrobacterium are used for genetic transformation of a variety of plants including medicinal plants. Typically, A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes are used in the induction of crown gall and hairy roots respectively. These transformed cultures can be used for generating better plants with increased adoption to  saline soils, drought, pests and pesticides. These cultures can also be used for exploiting secondary metabolism in plants and to manipulate the yield of phytoconstitutents. Genetic transformation of the economic and medicinal plants using Agrobacterium is promising tool in the plant biotechnology. The present article attempts to summarise the important advancements in the use of Agrobacterium for genetic manipulation.

 

KEYWORDS: Medicinal plants, Agrobacterium, A. tumefaciens, A. rhizogenes, phytoconstitutents, plant biotechnology.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Agrobacterium is a Gram-negative soil bacterium. Genetic transformation of the medicinal plants using Agrobacterium is an important tool in the plant biotechnology. A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes are commonly used in the genetic manipulation of the important medicinal, aromatic and economically important members of the plant kingdom. Crown gall and hairy roots are induced by use of A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes respectively. These transformed cultures have been explored for the purpose of metabolite engineering. The present article is an attempt to present the important advancements in the studies involving use of Agrobacterium for genetic manipulation.

 

Regeneration of Medicinal Plants:

Young stem segments from Lycium barbarum L. stem explants treated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58cl were utilized to produce regenerated plants1. The stem explants of Morinda officinalis were co-cultivated with A. tumefaciens (strain EHA101), and later, used for plant regeneration2. Agrobacterium-based transformation of Nicotiana africana Merxm. root explants have been used to produce kanamycin-resistant plants3. Leaf explants of Nicotiana tabacum and N. benthamiana co-cultured with A. tumefaciens GV3101 displayed active shoot regeneration property in cuture media without any plant hormones4. A. tumefaciens (EHA105) co-cultivated embryonic explants of Ricinus communis L. resulted in production of transgenic castor5. Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) has been transformed using A. tumefaciens (strain GV3850)6. Embryogenic tissue of Norway spruce (Picea abies) was genetic transformed using A. tumefaciens to incorporate Cry3A gene of Bt7. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) was genetically manipulated with A. tumefaciens (strain EHA105)8.

 

Production of Secondary Metabolites:

Bacopa monnieri has been transformed with Agrobacterium rhizogenes strains LBA 9402. The transformed roots had higher content of phytoconstituents (bacopasaponin D, bacopasaponin F, bacopaside II and bacopaside V) than the normal roots9A. rhizogenes A4-mediated transformation of Catharanthus roseus led to hairy roots containing higher amounts of catharanthine. Catharanthine on reaction with vindoline forms anticancer drug vinblastine10. Transgenic "hairy" roots and plants of Cichorium intybus L. have been produced Agrobacterium species11.

 

Improvement of Wheat:

Immature embryos of tetraploid Triticum turgidum L. var. durum were transformed using A. tumefaciens12. Mature embryos of Triticum species (T. aestivum and T. durum) were transformed with A. tumefaciens LBA4404 strain13. T. aestivum L. and T. turgidum L. have been transformed using of A. tumefaciens14.

 

Improvement of Sorghum:

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench has been subjected to genetic manipulation using Agrobacterium and stable plants were successfully produced15. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cry1Ab gene was incorporated into Sorghum (S. bicolor L.) using A. tumefaciens. The resultant plants have resistance to pink rice borer16.

 

Transformation of Commercial Crops

A. tumefaciens (strains EHA105, C58C1, and KYRT1) were used to produce recalcitrant Lens culinaris Medik17. Pineapple (Ananas comosus L., Merr.) leaf bases were treated with Agrobacterium  suspension. This system was used for growing pineapple plants18. Soybean was transformed using Agrobacterium species for establishing an efficient genetic transformation system for three Chinese genotypes (namely: Yuechun 04-5, Yuechun 03-3, and Tianlong 1)19.

 

Transformation of Fungal Species:

Conidia of Beauveria bassiana have been subjected to A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation which led to hygromycin resistant transformants20. Fungus Penicillium digitatum has been subjected to transformation with A. tumefaciens.

 

Miscellaneous Cases of Genetic Manipulation:

Lycopersicon peruvianum var. dentatum has been successfully transformed with pG11 plasmid22. A. tumefaciens (EHA105) has been used for genetic transformation of Euonymus alatus hypocotyl explants for producing transgenic shoots23. Agrobacterium tumefaciens has been used for genetic transformation of Ramonda myconi (L.) Rchb. and to produce plants free of morphological abnormalities24. Platanus acerifolia Willd. has also been successfully subjected to genetic engineering using A. tumefaciens25. Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth. leaf explants were subjected to genetic transformation with Agrobacterium species and transformed plants were produced26. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud leaf midribs  led to production of transgenic plants27. AgarTrap-mediated genetic transformation of Marchantia polymorpha L. has been reported28.

 

CONCLUSIONS:

Genetic transformation of the economic and medicinal plants using Agrobacterium is promising tool in the plant biotechnology. These transformed cultures have potential for raising better plants which can withstand the adversaries such as calcinated soils, saline conditions, drought, pests and pesticides. These cultures can also be used for secondary metabolite engineering.

 

REFERENCES:

1.     Du LQ, Wang HZ, Huang FC, et al. Genetic transformation of Lycium barbarum L. via A. tumefaciens. Sci China B 1994; 37 (3):286-92.

2.     He H, Xu HH. [In vitro culture and the Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Morinda officinalis]. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2002; 27 (10):733-5.

3.     Shcherbak NL, Belokurova VB, Komarnitskii IK, et al. [Genetic transformation of Nicotiana africana Merxm. with plasmids containing lox recombination]. Tsitol Genet 2004; 38 (4):3-8.

4.     Han ZF, Hunter DM, Sibbald S, et al. Biological activity of the tzs gene of nopaline Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 in plant regeneration and genetic transformation. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2013; 26 (11):1359-65.

5.     Sujatha M, Sailaja M. Stable genetic transformation of castor (Ricinus communis L.) via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer using embryo axes from mature seeds. Plant Cell Rep 2005; 23 (12):803-10.

6.     Tang W, Newton RJ, Weidner DA. Genetic transformation and gene silencing mediated by multiple copies of a transgene in eastern white pine. J Exp Bot 2007; 58 (3):545-54.

7.     Briza J, Pavingerova D, Vlasak J, et al. Norway spruce (Picea abies) genetic transformation with modified Cry3A gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. Acta Biochim Pol 2013; 60 (3):395-400.

8.     Chetty VJ, Ceballos N, Garcia D, et al. Evaluation of four Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains for the genetic transformation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivar Micro-Tom. Plant Cell Rep 2013; 32 (2):239-47.

9.     Majumdar S, Garai S, Jha S. Genetic transformation of Bacopa monnieri by wild type strains of Agrobacterium rhizogenes stimulates production of bacopa saponins in transformed calli and plants. Plant Cell Rep 2011; 30 (5):941-54.

10.  Zhou ML, Zhu XM, Shao JR, et al. An protocol for genetic transformation of Catharanthus roseus by Agrobacterium rhizogenes A4. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2012; 166 (7):1674-84.

11.  Matvieieva N, Shakhovsky A, Kvasko O, et al. High frequency genetic transformation of Cichorium intybus l. using nptII gene as a selective marker. Tsitol Genet 2015; 49 (4):11-6.

12.  Wu H, Doherty A, Jones HD. Efficient and rapid Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) using additional virulence genes. Transgenic Res 2008; 17 (3):425-36.

13.  Moghaieb RE, El-Arabi NI, Momtaz OA, et al. Genetic transformation of mature embryos of bread (T. aestivum) and pasta (T. durum) wheat genotypes. GM Crops 2010; 1 (2):87-93.

14.  Sparks CA, Doherty A, Jones HD. Genetic transformation of wheat via Agrobacterium-mediated DNA delivery. Methods Mol Biol 2014; 1099:235-50.

15.  Gao Z, Jayaraj J, Muthukrishnan S, et al. Efficient genetic transformation of Sorghum using a visual screening marker. Genome 2005; 48 (2):321-33.

16.  Zhang M, Tang Q, Chen Z, et al. [Genetic transformation of Bt gene into sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 2009; 25 (3):418-23.

17.  Akcay UC, Mahmoudian M, Kamci H, et al. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of a recalcitrant grain legume, lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Plant Cell Rep 2009; 28 (3):407-17.

18.  Mhatre M. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of pineapple (Ananas comosus L., Merr.). Methods Mol Biol 2013; 11013:435-53.

19.  Song ZY, Tian JL, Fu WZ, et al. Screening Chinese soybean genotypes for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation suitability. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2013; 14 (4):289-98.

20.  dos Reis MC, Pelegrinelli Fungaro MH, Delgado Duarte RT, et al. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. J Microbiol Methods 2004; 58 (2):197-202.

21.  Wang JY, Li HY. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of the phytopathogenic fungus Penicillium digitatum. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2008; 9 (10):823-8.

22.  Rudas VA, Piven NM, Rivkin MI, et al. [The genetic transformation of Lycopersicon peruvianum var. dentatum by using Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying a plasmid with the human beta-interferon gene]. Tsitol Genet 1997; 31 (2):17-22.

23.  Chen Y, Lu L, Deng W, et al. In vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Euonymus alatus. Plant Cell Rep 2006; 25 (10):1043-51.

24.  Toth S, Kiss C, Scott P, et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of the desiccation tolerant resurrection plant Ramonda myconi (L.) Rchb. Plant Cell Rep 2006; 25 (5):442-9.

25.  Li ZN, Fang F, Liu GF, et al. Stable Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of London plane tree (Platanus acerifolia Willd.). Plant Cell Rep 2007; 26 (5):641-50.

26.  Paul A, Bakshi S, Sahoo DP, et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth. Using leaf explants: bactericidal effect of leaf extracts and counteracting strategies. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2012; 166 (8):1871-95.

27.  An X, Wang B, Liu L, et al. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic plants using leaf midribs as explants in ramie [Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud]. Mol Biol Rep 2014; 41 (5):3257-69.

28.  Tsuboyama-Tanaka S, Kodama Y. AgarTrap-mediated genetic transformation using intact gemmae/gemmalings of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. J Plant Res 2015; 128 (2):337-44.

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 06.03.2017          Modified on 18.03.2017

Accepted on 28.04.2017      ©AandV Publications All right reserved

Res.  J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2017; 9(2): 125-127.

DOI: 10.5958/0975-4385.2017.00023.1