Pharmacognostical Studies on
Leaves of Allamanda cathartica with
Detail Physicochemical and Phytochemical Evaluation
Kirteebala P. Pawar1*, Milind J. Bhitre2, Priyanka
V. Kalamkar1, Mohan K. Kale1
1Department of Pharmaceutics, Assistant
Professor, Konkan Gyanpeeth
Rahul Dharkar College of
Pharmacy and Research Institute, Karjat.
2 Department of Pharmaceutical
Chemistry, Professor, C. U. Shah College of Pharmacy, Santacrutz,
Mumbai *Corresponding Author E-mail: kirtee.khairnar@rediffmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Allamanda cathartica L. is
an evergreen vine like woody shrub which is a genus of mostly climbing shrub of
Apocyanaceae family. In traditional medicine in
moderate doses, the leaves are used as a cathartic, their infusion or extract
is given in colic. Therefore in this context the detailed pharmacognostic
study of leaves with reference to physicochemical and phytochemical
evaluation has been carried out with aim to establish its pharmacognostical
standards. The phytochemical studies of methanolic extract of leaves reveals the presence of
carbohydrates, reducing sugars, hexose sugar, Saponin glycosides, flavonoids,
alkaloids, amino acids, phenolic compounds, steroids,
proteins.
KEYWORDS: Allamanda cathartica, methanolic extract, leaves, physicochemical evaluation, phytochemical evaluation, HPTLC.
INTRODUCTION:
The genus Allamanda belongs
to family Apocyanaceae comprises of many vatieties like A. blanchetti and
A .violacea1. It is an erect, evergreen, variable shrub; up to 4
meter in height, widely grown in Indian gardens.The
plants does not tolerate shade, salty or alkaline soils. They are highly
sensitive to frost1. Allamanda cathartica L. (Apocyanaceae) is
commonly known as Angel’s trumpet, Yellow bell1. It is native to
South and Central America and West Indies. It is distributed throughout
tropics. It is in many parts of Central, Eastern, and Southern India and in
Andaman Islands. Roots, shoots, leaves, flowers, fruits, milky sap and whole
plant are used2.
Fig. No. 1: Plant
of Allamanda
cathartica
Linn.
DESCRIPTION:
1, 3
Leaves:
They are whorled, obviate to oblong lanceolate, 8-12*2.5-4.0cm, wavy and which may be either
opposite or whorls of three or four.
Flowers:
Flowers are very large, usually yellow, in
few flowered terminal and auxiliary cymes. Corrolla
with short tubular base, then suddenly companulate,
lobes rounded, contorted to the left, throat with a ring of ciliate scales. Overy one celled with two parietal placentae
and many ovules.
Fruits:
These are globus
with numerous stout, green prickles, finally two valved.
Seeds:
Capsules are subglobose,
4 to 6 cm in diameter and densely prickled. They contain many tan, flattened,
winged seeds.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The plant material used in this
investigation consists of leaves of Allamanda cathartica Linn (Family: Apocynaceae)
which was collected from local market and was authenticated by Nicholas Piramal Pvt. Ltd., Goregaon,
Mumbai. Extraction was performed by continuous extraction using Soxhlet
extractor. Methanol was the solvent used for extraction.
Preliminary physico-chemical evaluation4:
Evaluation of drug means confirmation of
its identity and determination of its quality, purity and detection of the
nature of adulteration. The evaluation of a crude drug is necessary because of
three main reasons: biochemical variation in the drug, deterioration due to
treatment and storage and substitution and adulteration. Preliminary
Phytochemical screening is a part of chemical evaluation. The qualitative
chemical test is useful in detection of adulteration. Air dried leaves were
used for quantitative determination of loss on drying, total ash, acid
insoluble ash, alcohol soluble extractive values according to standard
procedure of Indian Pharmacopoeia (Anonumous, 1996).
Phytochemical
investigation5:
The plant is biosynthetic laboratory, not
only for chemical compounds such as carbohydrates, proteins and lipids, but
also for a multitude of compounds like glycosides, alkaloids, volatile oils,
tannins etc that exert physiological and therapeutic effects. The compounds
that are responsible for medical property of the drug are usually secondary
metabolites. A systemic study of a crude drug embraces, through consideration
of primary and secondary metabolites. Thus the plant material is subjected to
preliminary phytochemical screening for the detection
of various plant constituents.24 Phytochemical analysis of extract
was conducted following the procedure of Indian Pharmacopoeia (Anonymous,
1996). By this analysis, the presence of several phytochemicals
likes alkaloid; flavonoid, tannin, saponin, protein and carbohydrate were tested.
High performance
thin layer chromatography (HPTLC):
High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography
studies are major advancement of TLC principles. HPTLC studies were carried out
to obtain the finger print of methanolic extract of Allamanda cathartica Lin.
extract, which offers better quantitative resolution and requires shorter time.
The conditions
followed for HPTLC development were as follows:
Conditions of
applications:
Instrument used : Linomat IV
applicator.
Test plates : Silica gel GF254 (E-Merk) precoated aluminium plates.
Format : 10 X
10 cm.
Spotting volume : 2µl, 4µl and 10µl.
Band size : 8 mm.
Speed of drying time : 15 sec/µl.
Nitrogen pressure : 2 psi.
Conditions of
chromatography:
Solvent system : All analytical grade solvents.
Separation technique :
Ascending type.
Development chamber : Twin trough glass chamber.
Distance of migration : 9 cm.
Conditions of
scanning:
Instrument: Camag
Scanner IV.
Mode
: Absorption / reflection with
deuterium lamp.
Wavelength: UV-254 nm, 366 nm, 580 nm.
Slit dimension: 6X 0.30 mm.
HPTLC fingerprints of the fractions were
obtained using the above chromatographic conditions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Preliminary physico-chemical evaluation:4
It is necessary that every medicinal plant
prior to its use be identified and standardized for its various physicochemical
parameters. Air dried leaves were used for quantitative determination of phytochemical values. The ash values, extractive values,
percentage yield, color and consistency of methanolic
extract of Allamanda
cathartica
L. were determined five times as per WHO recommendations. (Table No.1, 2)
Table No. 1: Ash and extractive values:
Drug |
Total Ash Value |
Acid Insoluble Ash |
Water Soluble Ash |
Sulphated Ash |
Water Extractive |
Alcohol Extractive |
Allamanda cathartica |
9.33%w/w |
3.70%w/w |
5.25%w/w |
6.50%w/w |
18.20%w/w |
4.88%w/w |
Table No. 2: Percentage yield, color, consistency of extracts of Allamanda cathartica Linn.
Extraction solvent |
% Yield |
Color |
Consistency |
Methanol |
32.06 % |
Greenish
Brown |
Viscous |
Phytochemical
Investigation5:
The preliminary phytochemical
screening of methanol extract showed the presence of carbohydrate, saponin glycoside, coumarin
glycoside, alkaloids and proteins.(Table No. 3)
Table No. 3:
Preliminary phytochemical screening for Allamanda cathartica Linn.
Name of the test |
Methanolic extract |
Carbohydrates |
+ |
Reducing sugar |
+ |
Monosaccharides |
+ |
Pentose sugar |
+ |
Hexose sugar |
+ |
Non reducing polysaccharides |
- |
Glycosides |
|
Cardiac glycosides |
- |
Anthraquinone glycosides |
- |
Saponin glycosides |
+ |
Coumarin glycosides |
- |
Flavonoids |
+ |
Alkaloids |
+ |
Phenolic compound |
+ |
Steroids |
+ |
Proteins |
+ |
Amino acids |
+ |
High performance
thin layer chromatography (HPTLC):
TLC plate were examine under ultra violet
light at 254 nm, 366 nm, 580 nm. The mobile phases used for methanolic extract
was as mentioned in Table No.4.The fingerprints obtained for extract
were as shown in Figure No.2.Rf values and color of the bands obtained were
recorded. (Table 5, 6, 7)
Table No.4: The
mobile phases of methanolic extract and it’s TLC
plates for the plant extract Allamanda cathartica Linn.
Sr. no. |
Extract |
Mobile phase |
Spot observed |
1 |
Methanol
|
Toluene : Chloroform: Ethanol [8:8:2] |
13 |
Image
at 366 nm Image at 254 nm Image at 580nm
Fig. No.2: Fingerprints of methanolic
extract of Allamanda
cathartica
Linn.
Table No.5: HPTLC peak
area of methanolic extract (10µl) of Allamanda cathartica Linn.
at 254 nm.
Peak |
Start Rf |
Start Ht |
Max Rf |
Max Ht |
Max % |
End Rf |
End Ht |
Area |
Area % |
1 |
0.04 |
28.7 |
0.06 |
159.9 |
12.19 |
0.07 |
2.2 |
1554.0 |
3.75 |
2 |
0.08 |
7.6 |
0.09 |
23.9 |
1.82 |
0.11 |
0.6 |
266.5 |
0.64 |
3 |
0.18 |
6.8 |
0.21 |
21.0 |
1.60 |
0.23 |
1.6 |
432.5 |
1.04 |
4 |
0.29 |
14.0 |
0.37 |
302.5 |
23.05 |
0.41 |
27.9 |
9431.0 |
22.73 |
5 |
0.41 |
28.0 |
0.45 |
134.6 |
10.26 |
0.47 |
55.9 |
3741.3 |
9.02 |
6 |
0.47 |
56.0 |
0.48 |
66.4 |
5.06 |
0.50 |
50.3 |
1179.9 |
2.84 |
7 |
0.50 |
50.7 |
0.54 |
118.7 |
9.04 |
0.55 |
100.1 |
3235.6 |
7.80 |
8 |
0.55 |
100.5 |
0.56 |
123.2 |
9.39 |
0.59 |
13.8 |
2364.9 |
5.70 |
9 |
0.59 |
13.8 |
0.62 |
44.2 |
3.37 |
0.66 |
3.2 |
1256.6 |
3.03 |
10 |
0.70 |
2.9 |
0.87 |
205.5 |
15.66 |
0.92 |
100.3 |
15504.4 |
37.37 |
11 |
0.92 |
100.3 |
0.94 |
112.2 |
8.56 |
0.97 |
1.7 |
2523.3 |
6.08 |
Table No.6: HPTLC peak area
of methanolic extract (10µl) of Allamanda cathartica Linn. at 366 nm.
Peak |
Start Rf |
Start Ht |
Max Rf |
Max Ht |
Max % |
End Rf |
End Ht |
Area |
Area % |
1 |
0.09 |
0.1 |
0.11 |
19.5 |
1.74 |
0.13 |
4.6 |
256.1 |
0.99 |
2 |
0.15 |
3.8 |
0.18 |
56.4 |
5.05 |
0.20 |
22.3 |
1026.4 |
3.96 |
3 |
0.20 |
22.3 |
0.22 |
41. |
3.71 |
0.24 |
15.5 |
747.9 |
2.89 |
4 |
0.24 |
15.3 |
0.30 |
130.6 |
11.69 |
0.32 |
40.2 |
3347.3 |
12.93 |
5 |
0.32 |
40.3 |
0.33 |
42.8 |
3.84 |
0.36 |
0.9 |
690.5 |
2.67 |
6 |
0.36 |
1.0 |
0.39 |
315.2 |
28.22 |
0.41 |
162.1 |
6475.1 |
25.01 |
7 |
0.41 |
162.2 |
0.43 |
283.3 |
25.37 |
0.48 |
54.1 |
7192.9 |
27.78 |
8 |
0.48 |
54.9 |
0.51 |
73.3 |
6.56 |
0.53 |
1.0 |
2184.1 |
8.43 |
9 |
0.54 |
1.3 |
0.56 |
38.3 |
3.43 |
0.56 |
36.5 |
519.8 |
2.01 |
10 |
0.58 |
38.6 |
0.60 |
50.5 |
4.52 |
0.64 |
20.1 |
1781.9 |
6.88 |
11 |
0.64 |
19.8 |
0.68 |
37.8 |
3.39 |
0.71 |
0.4 |
1123.7 |
4.34 |
12 |
0.71 |
0.5 |
0.74 |
27.7 |
2.48 |
0.77 |
1.0 |
547.8 |
2.12 |
Table No.7: HPTLC peak area
of methanolic extract (10µl) of Allamanda cathartica Linn. at 580 nm.
Peak |
Start Rf |
Start Ht |
Max Rf |
Max Ht |
Max % |
End Rf |
End Ht |
Area |
Area % |
1 |
0.04 |
1.8 |
0.05 |
127.1 |
5.91 |
0.07 |
0.6 |
1312.9 |
1.61 |
2 |
0.07 |
0.4 |
0.08 |
11.5 |
0.53 |
0.09 |
0.4 |
86.7 |
0.11 |
3 |
0.10 |
0.0 |
0.12 |
34.4 |
1.60 |
0.15 |
0.2 |
633.0 |
0.78 |
4 |
0.15 |
0.1 |
0.18 |
149.0 |
6.93 |
0.20 |
0.9 |
2589.2 |
3.18 |
5 |
0.21 |
0.0 |
0.25 |
64.5 |
3.00 |
0.29 |
7.1 |
1345.3 |
1.65 |
6 |
0.29 |
7.3 |
0.36 |
247.6 |
11.51 |
0.39 |
110.1 |
9220.3 |
11.33 |
7 |
0.41 |
112.5 |
0.43 |
153.1 |
7.11 |
0.45 |
101.1 |
3612.4 |
4.44 |
8 |
0.45 |
101.2 |
0.47 |
184.0 |
8.55 |
0.49 |
137.5 |
5309.4 |
6.53 |
9 |
0.50 |
138.8 |
0.56 |
366.8 |
17.05 |
0.56 |
362.6 |
12392.4 |
15.23 |
10 |
0.57 |
363.0 |
0.58 |
383.0 |
17.80 |
0.62 |
163.0 |
12144.5 |
14.93 |
11 |
0.66 |
78.7 |
0.69 |
128.0 |
5.95 |
0.74 |
70.1 |
5428.3 |
6.67 |
12 |
0.74 |
69.9 |
0.86 |
302.2 |
14.05 |
0.97 |
7.4 |
27288.6 |
33.54 |
CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, the physicochemical and phytochemical evaluation and HPTLC fingerprinting of leaves
of Allamanda
cathartica
L. can assist as a relevant source of information for further medicinal studies
of this plant in future exploration.
REFERENCES:
1.
Wealth of India – a dictionary of Indian
Raw Material and Industrial Products, National Institute of Science, CSIR, New
Delhi Publication, Volume 1, 1998; 164-165.
2.
Rastogi, Malhotra, Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants, Drug
Research Perspective: A, CDRI series 1980, volume 3; 30.
3.
A.K. Nadkarni’s
Indian Materia Medica, Popular Prakashan,
volume 1; 62.
4.
Arya Vaidya Sala, Kottakkal:
Indian Medicinal Plants – a compendium of 500 species, Orient Lonfman Ltd Publication, Volume 4; 290-296.
5.
The Ayurvedic
Pharmacopoeia of India, Govt. of India Ministry of Health and Family, New
Delhi, 1st edition, volume 1, 2001; 234-255.
6.
C. K. Kokate,
A. P. Purohit and S. B. Gokhale:
Pharmacognosy, 5th edition, Nirali Prakashan, Pune, 1997; 106-108.
7.
R. D. Chaudhari:
Herbal Drugs Industry, 1st edition, 1996; 1-3.
Received
on 07.04.2015 Modified on 19.04.2015
Accepted
on 26.04.2015 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy & Phytochem.
7(2): April-June 2015; Page 69-72
DOI: 10.5958/0975-4385.2015.00013.8