Antimicrobial
Activity of Drakshasava Prepared by Traditional and
Modern Methods
Preeti Tiwari*
Head of Department of Pharmacognosy, Dr.
K. N. Modi Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and
Research, Modinagar (U. P.)
*Corresponding Author E-mail: preetitiwari198311@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
In the present investigation, different
types of test preparations of Drakshasava as Drakshasava-T, Drakshasava-M prepared
by traditional and modern methods respectively and marketed Drakshasava
were evaluated for antimicrobial activity against commom
human pathogens. It was observed that all the test preparations of Drakshasava exhibited significant zone of inhibition
against selected common human pathogens. The results indicate that all the test
preparations of Drakshasava as Drakshasava-T,
Drakshasava-M and marketed Drakshasava
might be used as natural drug for the treatment of several infectious diseases
caused by these organisms.
KEYWORDS: Drakshasava-T, Drakshasava-M,
Antimicrobial activity.
1.
INTRODUCTION:
In India, medicinal plants form
the backbone of several indigenous traditional systems of medicine.
Pharmacological studies have acknowledged the value of medicinal plants as
potential source of bioactive compounds1. Phytochemicals
from medicinal plants serve as lead compounds in drug discovery and design2.
Medicinal plants are rich source of novel drugs that forms the ingredients in
traditional system of medicine, modern medicines, nutraceuticals,
food supplements, folk medicines, pharmaceutical intermediates, bioactive
principles and lead compounds in synthetic drugs3.
WHO, report depicts that more
than 80% of world’s population rely on plant based products to meet health care
needs. Nearly, 25 to 45% of modern prescriptions contain plant derived lead
molecules as a basic source in drug formulations. The value of plant based
prescribed drugs in 1990 was estimated at $ 15.5 billion which has been on the
raise since then. Furthermore, about 42% of 25 top selling drugs marketed
worldwide are either directly obtained from natural sources or entities derived
from plant products4.
Furthermore the active
components of herbal remedies have the advantages of being combined with many
other substances that appear to be inactive.
However, these complementary
components give the plant as a whole safety and efficiency much superior to
that of its isolated and pure active components.
Presently, in the developing
countries, synthetic drugs are not only expensive and inadequate for the
treatment of diseases but are also often with adulteration and side effects5.
Therefore, there is the need to search for plants and plant derived
formulations of medicinal value.
Drakshasava is a polyherbal
hydroalcoholic preparation and is used to improve
digestion, as blood purifier, in the treatment of anaemia
and advised as a choice of remedy in respiratory problems. The chief ingredient
of Drakshasava is draksha,
dried fruits of Vitis vinifera6. The composition
and properties of fruits of Vitis vinifera have been extensively investigated and it was
reported that they contain large amount of phenolic
compounds as catechins, epicatechin,
quercetin and gallic acid, dimeric, trimeric and tetrameric procyanidins7-8. These compounds have
many favourable effects on human health such as
lowering of human low density lipoproteins, reduction of heart disease and
cancer because of their antioxidant property9-16.
Therefore, we undertook the
present investigation to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of Drakshasava-T, Drakshasava-M
prepared by traditional and modern methods respectively and marketed Drakshasava against common human pathogens.
2. MATERIALS AND METHOD:
2.1 Preparation of Drakshasava-T:
This was prepared by the method
as given in Ayurvedic Formulary of India, Part-II6.
The ingredients were procured from local market, Jamnagar. Identification of
individual plant material was done as per Ayurvedic
Pharmacopoeia of India. Authentication of all these ingredients was done by Dr.G. D. Bagchi, Scientist,
Department of Taxonomy and Pharmacognosy, Central Institute of Medicinal and
Aromatic Plants, Lucknow. Prepared herbarium has been deposited in CIMAP for
future reference.
According to this method, dried
fruits of Vitis vinifera were
crushed and then placed in polished vessel of brass along with prescribed
quantity of water (16.384 L), and allowed to steep overnight. After overnight
steeping, this material was warmed at medium flame until the water for
decoction reduced to one fourth of the prescribed quantity (4.096 L), then the
heating was stopped and it was filtered through unstarched
muslin cloth in cleaned and fumigated vessel and after that jaggery
and honey were added and mixed properly. Then dhataki
flowers (Woodfordia floribunda) and prescribed quantity of
coarsely powdered prakshepa dravyas
as Myristica fragrans (flowers),
Eugenia caryophyllus
(flower bud), Cubeba officinalis (fruits),
Santalum album (heart wood), Piper nigrum
(fruits), Cinnamomum zeylanicum
(stem bark), Eletteria cardamomum
(seeds) and Cinnamomum tamala
(leaves) were added and this sweet filtered fluid was placed for fermentation
in incubator for fifteen days at 33ºC± 1ºC.
After fifteen days, completion of fermentation was confirmed by standard
tests17. The fermented preparation was filtered with unstarched muslin cloth and kept in cleaned covered vessel
for further next seven days. Then, it was poured in clean amber colored glass
bottles previously rinsed with ethyl alcohol, packed and labelled
properly.
2.2 Preparation of Drakshasava-M:
Method of preparation was same
as followed with Drakshasava-T, only dhataki flowers were replaced with yeast for inducing
fermentation18.
2.3 Antimicrobial Activity Test:
Antimicrobial activity of Drakshasava-T, Drakshasava-M and
marketed Drakshasava was tested using a modified disc
diffusion assay (DDA) method originally described by Baurer
(1966)19. Test preparations of Drakshasava
were dissolved in 20% DMSO treated water. The inoculums for each microorganism
were prepared from broth cultures (105 CFU/ml). A loop of culture
from the slant stock was cultured in nutrient agar medium overnight and spread
with a sterile swab into Petri-plates. Sterile disc (6 mm dia,
Hi-media Mumbai, India) impregnated with test preparations (100µl/disc) and Kanamycin (30µg/disc) were placed on the culture plates and
incubated for 24h at 37ºC. The solvent (DMSO) loaded disc without test
preparations served as control in the study. The results were recorded by
measuring the zones of growth inhibition. Clear inhibition zones around discs
indicated the presence of antimicrobial activity. All data of antimicrobial
activity were taken as average of triplicate.
2.
RESULTS:
All types of Drakshasava
as Drakshasava-T, Drakshasava-M
prepared by traditional and modern methods respectively and marketed Drakshasava showed significant antibacterial activity by
exhibiting significant zone of inhibition against common human pathogens as Staphylococcus aureus,
Bacillus subtilis, Salmonella typhii,
Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as
shown in Table 1.
4. DISCUSSION:
Plants are known to have
beneficial therapeutic effects documented in Traditional Indian System of
Medicine. Though bioactive products of Draksha and
its preparations as Drakshasava have been used in
treatment of various ailments since time immemorial, role of phytochemicals in inhibition of growth of microorganisms
has gained less prominence20. In the present study, preparations of Drakshasava as Drakshasava-T, Drakshasava-M and marketed Drakshasava
exhibited significant antibacterial activity against common human pathogens.
Further investigations may lead to the development of naturally derived new
antibiotics of high potency.
Table1. Diameter of Zone of Inhibition (mm) of Drakshasava-T,
Drakshasava-M and marketed Drakshasava
Sample |
Zone of Inhibition (mm) |
||||
Staphylococcus aureus |
Bacillus subtilis |
Salmonella typhii |
Escherichia coli |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
|
Drakshasava-T (100µl/disc) |
25.63±0.75 |
28.76±1.41 |
29.58±0.93 |
27.49±0.88 |
25.72±0.84 |
Drakshasava-M (100µl/disc) |
24.46±0.86 |
27.59±0.41 |
28.47±0.59 |
26.64±0.96 |
24.66±0.72 |
Marketed Drakshasava
(100µl/disc) |
23.62±1.21 |
25.82±0.97 |
26.68±0.79 |
25.72±0.61 |
23.59±1.43 |
Kanamycin (30µg/disc) |
28±1.24 |
34±0.98 |
33.14±0.87 |
34.91±1.42 |
32.64±0.59 |
Negative Control (DMSO) |
Negative |
Negative |
Negative |
Negative |
Negative |
All values are shown as mean± SD
of three replicates
5. REFERENCES:
1. Prusti A, Mishra
SR, sahoo S and Mishra SK.
Antibacterial activity of Some Indian Medicinal Plants. Ethnobotanical
Leaflets 2008; 12:227-230.
2. Ebi GC and Ofoefule
SI (2000) Antimicrobial Activity of Pterocarpus osun stems. Fitoterapia
71:433-435.
3. Ncube NS, Afolayan
AJ, Okoh A. Assessment Techniques of antimicrobial
properties of natural compounds of plant origin:current
methods and future trends. Africal Journal of
Biotechnology 2008; 7(12):1797-1806.
4. Ramya S, Govindaraji
V, Kannan NK and Jayakumararaj
R. In vitro evaluation of
antibacterial activity using crude extracts of Catharanthus roseus
L. Ethnobatanical Leaflets 2008; 12:1013-1018.
5. Shariff Z U . Modern Herbal Therapy for
Common Ailments. Nature Pharmacy Series, Spectrum Books Limited. Ibadan,
Nigeria in Association with Safari Books (Export) Limited, United Kingdom,
2001; vol. 1, 94.
6. The Ayurvedic
Formulary of India, Part-II, 2000, 1st edition, The Controller of
Publications, Delhi, p.35.
7. Baydar NG, Ozkan
G, Sagdic O. Total phenolic
contents and antibacterial activities of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) extracts. Food Control
2004; 15:335-339.
8. Akoh CC, Bonilla EP, Sellappan S, Krewer G. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Muscadine grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry 2003; 51:5497-5503.
9. Frankel EN, Kanner
J, German JB, Parks E, Kinsella JE. Inhibition of
oxidation of human low-density lipoprotein by phenolic
substances in red wine. The Lancet 1993; 341(20):454-457.
10. Mayer AS, Yi OS, Person DA,
Waterhouse DL, Frankel EN. Inhibition of human low density lipoprotein
oxidation in relation to composition of phenolic
antioxidants in grapes (Vitis vinifera).
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1997; 45:1638-1643.
11. Teissedre PL, Frankel EN, Waterhouse AL, Peleg H, German GB. Inhibition of in vitro human LDL oxidation by phenolic
antioxidants from grapes and wines. Journal of the Science of Food and
Agriculture 1996; 70:55-61.
12. Waterhouse AL. Wine antioxidants
may reduce heart disease and cancer. Presentation of American Chemical Society,
Washington; 1994.
13. Renaud S, Lorgeril
MD. Wine, alcohol, platelets and the French paradox for coronary heart disease.
The Lancet 1992; 339:1523-1526.
14. Davalos A, Bortolome
B, Gomez-cordoves C. Antioxidant properties of
commercial grape juices and vinegars. Food Chemistry 2005; 93(2):325-330.
15. Orhan DD, Orhan N, Ergun E, Ergun F. Hepatoprotective
effect of Vitis vinifera L.
leaves on carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver damage in rats. Jornal of Ethnopharmacology 2007;
112:145-151.
16. Corder R, Mullen W, Khan NQ, Marks SC,
Wood EG, Carrier MJ, Crozier A. Red wine procyanidins
and vascular health. Nature 2006;444:566.
17. Mishra S. Bhaisazya
Kalpana Vigyan. Varanasi,
India: Chaukambha Surbharati
Prakashan; 2005.p. 253-254.
18. Alam M, Radhamani
S, Ali U, Purushottam KK. Microbiological Screening
of Dhataki Flowers. Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Siddha 1984;
2(4):371-375.
19. Bauer RW, Kirby MDK, Sherris JC and Turck M .
Antibiotic susceptibility Testingby standard single
disc diffusion method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology1966; 45:493-96.
20. Sasidharan VK, Krishnakumar
T and Manjula CB. Antimicrobial activity of Nine
Common plants in Kerala, India. PJS 1998, 127 (1):59-67.
Received
on 22.07.2014 Modified on 25.07.2014
Accepted
on 26.07.2014 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy & Phytochem.
6(3): July-Sept.2014; Page 126-128