Standardization
and Comparative Evaluation of Shivakshar Pachan Churna: A Traditional Ayurvedic Formulation
Varun Chaddha1*, Avinash Singh Kushwah2, Vaibhav Srivastava3
1Shri Ramnath
Singh Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Sitholi,
Gwalior
2Ramnath Singh Mahavidyalya , Gormi, Bhind
3NIPS Sitholi, Gwalior
*Corresponding Author E-mail: nurav86@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The aim of this study is to improve the
acceptability of Shivakshar Pachan
Churna, across the world by developing certain
quality control parameters and fingerprinting method according to WHO
guidelines for traditional formulations.
Two batches of Shivakshar Pachan
Churna (SPC) were purchased from the market for standardization and to check uniformity
in batches. All batches were physiochemically
evaluated for Extractive value, Phyto-constituents,
Moisture Content and Micromeritic parameters. In
present communication Chromatographic TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography) was
developed for the standardization of Shivakshar Pachan Churna an Ayurvedic formulation. Spectroscopic studies were carried
out to develop the spectrum of the formulation and validated by Overlain and
Linearity study (Beer`s law). We have developed a simple scheme for the
standardization and authentication of Shivakshar Pachan Churna (SPC) an Ayurvedic formulation. The present study signifies the use
of TLC, Spectroscopic Fingerprint profiles for deciding the identity, purity
and strength of the Shivakshar Pachan
Churna (SPC) an Ayurvedic
formulation.
KEYWORDS: Shivakshar Pachan
Churna (SPC) ; Shivakshar Pachan Churna Dabur
Pharmaceuticals (SPCD), Shivakshar Pachan Churna Sharmayu
Pharmaceuticals (SPCS), U.V. Spectroscopy; Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)
INTRODUCTION:
Ayurveda is a holistic healing science
which comprises of two words, Ayu and Veda. Ayu means life and Veda means knowledge or Science. So the literal meaning of the word Ayurveda is the science of life. The quality of herbal
medicine that is the profile of the constituents in the final product has
implication in efficacy and safety. Due to the complex nature and inherent
variability of the chemical constituents of the plant based drugs, it is
difficult to establish quality control parameters and modern analytical
techniques are expected to help in circumventing this problem. Shivakshar Pacha Churna (SPC) an Ayurvedic
formulation , consist of Hingvashtaka churna, Haritaki (Terminalia Chebula), and Sarji-kshara
ingredients in churna (powder) form .It
is one of the most widely used Ayurvedic
product. Shivakshar Pachan Churna is the fortified form of Hingvastaka churna.
Here Shiva stands for Haritaki
(Terminalia chebula) it
is one of the best known digestive rejuvenator; kashar
is for Sarjikshar it loosens and clears out the feces
from the bowel; Pachan is for Hingwashtak
Churna and also tells about its rejuvenating effect
on all aspects of the digestive system digestion, assimilation and excretion of
wastes and toxins. Shivakshar Pachan
Churna is useful in managing all the digestive
disturbances irrespective of the dosha involvement. Shivakshar Pachan Churna ignites the digestive fire and ensures timely bowel
clearance. Shivakshar pachan
churna digests Aama
deposited in body channels, it improves the functioning of liver. Therefore an attempt has been made to
standardize Shivakshar Pachan
Churna (SPC) an Ayurvedic
formulation based on their TLC, and U.V. Spectroscopic Fingerprint profile. The
marketed formulations were subjected to TLC and U.V. Spectroscopic
MATERIALS
AND METHODS:
All
the chemicals used in the experiment were of analytical grade. The U.V. spectra
were recorded on the Shimadzu-UVPharmaspac-1700spectrophotometer. The TLC was
performed on a silica Gel G plate. Two products of Shivakshar
Pachan Churna (SPC) from
two different manufacturers one from Dabur
Pharmaceuticals (SPCD) and other from Sharmayu
Pharmaceuticals (SPCS) were purchased from the market of District Jhansi (U.P).
Table1.
Formulation composition of Shivakshar Pachan Churna:
1. Haritaki
(Terminalia chebula)
33.33%
2. Hingvashtaka churna: 33.33%
Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Rz, 1 part
Ajamoda
(Apium leptophyllum) Fr. 1
part
Sveta jiraka (Cuminum cyminum)
Fr. 1 part
Caraway (Carum carvi) Fr. 1
part
Black
pepper (Piper nigrum)
Fr. 1 part
Pippali (Piper longum)
Fr. 1
part
Hing (Ferula foetida)
Exd. 1
part
Saindhava lava
(Black Salt) 1
part
3.
Sarji-kshara 33.33%
1.
Physico-Chemical Evaluation
A. Extractive values: Extractive values of SPCD and
SPCS (5gm) were obtained in methanol, chloroform, solvent ether of different batches were obtained in methanol, chloroform, ether,
n-hexane and distilled water as per the method given in Indian Pharmacopoeia and WHO guidelines. Results shown in table-1.(1,3)
B.
Organoleptic properties:
All
two batches of SPC were observed for color, odor, taste and appearance.(2)
C.
Moisture Content:
For determining the moisture
content 2gm of SPCD and SPCS were taken in a China Dish weighed. Dried in the
oven at 105°C for 5 hrs. Cool in a dessicator and
weight was measured till the constant weight. Results shown in table-1.(2)
D. Total Ash value:
For
determining the ash value 2 gm of ground air-dried material, accurately
weighed. Spread the material in an even
layer
and ignite it by gradually increasing the heat at 450oc until it is
white, indicating the absence of carbon. Cool in a dessicator
and weigh. (2)
Acid
insoluble ash:
For
determining the acid insoluble ash the ash was boiled with 25 ml. of 2M
hydrochloric acid for 5 minutes, collected the insoluble matter in an ash less
filter paper, washed with hot water, and ignite cool in a dessicator
and weight was measured. Calculated the percentage of acid insoluble ash with
reference to the air-dried drug. (2)
WATER
SOLUBLE ASH:
For
determining the water soluble
ash the total ash was boiled with 25 ml. of 2M hydrochloric acid for 5 minutes,
collected the insoluble matter in an ash less filter paper, washed with hot
water, and ignite for 15 min. at a temperature not exceeding 450˚C.
Substrated the weight of the insoluble matter from
the weight of the ash; the difference of weight represented the water-soluble
ash. Calculated the percentage of water-soluble ash with reference to the
air-dried drug.(2)
Table 2.
Physiochemical evaluation of SPCD and
SPCS
Analytical Parameters Mean of SPCD Mean of SPCS
Extractive Values
Water soluble 51.191 ± 0.101 57.472
± 0.283
Methanol
soluble 46.345 ± 0.167 28.657
± 0.189
Chloroform
soluble 14.404 ± 0.01
12.799 ±0.056
n-hexane
soluble 8.089 ±
0.1626 16.107 ±0.096
Ether soluble 4.892 ± 0.3095 4.997
± 0.0775
Moisture
Content 10.066
± 0.1061 5.3794±0.0814
E.
Phytochemical Evaluation:
The
methanol, chloroform, water, n-hexane, and ether extract of SPCD and SPCS
respectively were subjected to phytochemical test as
per the method given in standard reference book. Results shown in table-3.(4)
Table 4. Phyto-constituents
present in SPCD
S.No. |
Phytoconstituents |
SPCD |
SPCS |
||||||||
Wt. |
Et. |
CHCL3 |
MeOH |
n-hexane |
Wt. |
ET. |
CHCL3 |
MeOH |
n- hexane |
||
1. |
Alkaloids |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
2. |
Glycosides |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
3. |
Steroids |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
4. |
Protein |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
5. |
Carbohydrates |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
6. |
Saponins |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
7. |
Tannins |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
8. |
Flavanoids |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
2. Micromeretic
Parameters:
The
physical characteristics of the formulations were determined in terms of bulk
density, compressibility index and angle of repose in accordance the method
given in a Pharmacopeia of India (5). Results shown in table- 3.
Table 3. Micromeretic Parameters
of SPCD and SPCS
S.No
Parameters Mean of SPCD Mean of SPCS
1.
Bulk Density 0.7107±0.0077 0.5598±0.0035
2.
Tapped Density 1.12167±0.1476 0.8070±0.0123
3.
Compressibility 36.2335±2.6986 30.590±1.1309
index
4. Angle of repose 26.5185±0.3356 38.2672± 1.215
3.
Spectrophotometric Studies:
SPCD and SPCS were extracted separately in
distilled water, chloroform, methanol, ether and n-hexane. The extracts were
dried under reduced pressure and the extract of all the two batches were
studied spectrophotometrically for spectrum study. The Overlain spectrum and
linearity studies were performed with only distilled water and methanol soluble
extract of the formulations. The U.V. spectra were recorded in a Shimadzu-U.V.
Pharmaspac-1700 spectrophotometer. This study was performed to find out the
reproducible peaks in U.V. range 200-400nm (Overlain study) and content
uniformity (linearity study) in finished products.(6)
Spectrum
study:
All the extract from each batch of SPC were
dissolved in corresponding solvent. Their U.V- spectrum were recorded at the
range of 200-400nm.In each case the baseline were cleared against the solvent
in which the particular solution of extract is prepared. The scanned spectrums
were recorded and the peak of the maximum absorbance was noted. (6) Results
have been shown in table-5.
Overlain
spectrum study:
The overlain UV- spectrums were
recorded only aqueous and alcohol soluble extract of SPCD and SPCS were
recorded.(6)
Fig:1. Overlain
spectra of aq. Extract of SPCD
Fig:2. Overlain
spectra of aq. Extract of SPCS
Fig:3. Overlain spectra of alc. Extract of SPCS
Fig:4. Overlain spectra of alc. Extract of SPCD
Table 5 :
Absorption maxima of SPC:-
S.No |
Batch
no. |
Water
Extract |
Methanol
Extract |
Chloroform
Extract |
Ether
Extract |
N-
hexane Extract |
|
SPCD |
255.60 |
277.20
|
322.00
|
323.60 |
334.60 |
|
SPCS |
256.20
|
275.60
|
278.00
|
324.20 |
336.40 |
Linearity
Study:
The
linearity studies were carried out with aqueous and alcoholic solutions only.
SPC (1.25 gm) from each batch were dissolved separately in 25ml, of alcohol and
distilled water for 1 hour at 100rpm in cold conditions at 25°±1°C, then filter
the mixture. The prepared solution of the formulation were diluted in the
concentration range of 0.2-1 ml (of the formulation) for aqueous at
256.20nm and 0.2-1ml (of
the formulation) for alcoholic at 277.20
nm respectively. The linear correlation between these concentrations (X-
axes) and absorbance (Y- axes) were graphically presented and the slope (b),
intercept (a) and correlation coefficient (r) were calculated out for linear
equation by regression analysis by
Microsoft Excel.(6)
Fig.
5 Linearity
of Aq. Extract of SPCD
Fig.
6 Linearity of Aq. Extract of SPCS
Fig.
5 Linearity
of Aq. Extract of SPCD
Fig.
6 Linearity of Aq. Extract of SPCS
Table 7. Regression data for linearity Studies
S.No Extract Regression
SPCD SPCS
1.
Wtr.
Extract y=2.564x+0.006 y=2.242x+0.345
Regression=0.985 Regression=
0.995
2.
Alc. Extract y=2.181x+0.250 y=0.955x+0.001
Regression=0.989 Regression= 0.997
4.
Chromatographic studies(3):
Chromatographic studied was
performed for the TLC fingerprinting of SPC of different companies.
Test solution: 0.6gm of powdered churna was taken in an iodine flask. Than 12.5ml of
distilled water is added and 6hrs continuous shaked
and kept for 24hours. Water extract was filtered and kept for drying.
Solvent system: n-butanol:
acetic acid: water (4:1:5)
Procedure: Applied one spot of test
solution of different companies on precoated Silica
Gel G plate of uniform thickness of the plates were developed in the solvent
system.
Visualization: The plates were examined under
iodine vapour chamber.
Evaluation: Different Rf
value of different companies have been seen. SPCD gives Rf 0.41 while
SPCS gives Rf 0.35.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
The SPCD were sour and salty in taste,
yellowish brown in color, and characteristic odor. While SPCS were sour and
salty in taste, brownish in color and characteristic odor. All results are
presented in mean ±SEM. The loss on drying at 105°C is 10.066 ± 0.1061
for SPCD and SPCS were found to be 5.3794±0.0814 respectively. The parameters
like extractive values of SPCD in water, methanol, chloroform, hexane and ether
were found to be respectively indicated the presence of almost polar and semipolar components in the formulation, where the plant
material is used. The results of preliminary phytochemical
analysis also show the presence of alkaloids, glycosides, protein,
carbohydrate, saponin, tannins, flavanoids
in water extract of SPCD, in ether extract of SPCD showed the presence of
protein, carbohydrate, tannins and flavanoids,
chloroform extract of SPCD shows the presence of glycosides, steroids and
tannins, in methanol extract of SPCD showed the presence of glycosides, protein,
carbohydrate, saponins and tannins and the n- hexane
extract of SPCD showed the presence of steroids, saponins
and flavanoids while the presence of
alkaloids,glycosides,protein,carbohydrate,saponin,tannins,flavanoids in water
extract of SPCS, in ether extract of SPCS showed the presence of glycosides,
steroids, protein, saponin, and flavanoids,
chloroform extract of SPCS shows the presence of glycosides, steroids and
protein, in methanol extract of SPCS showed the presence of alkaloids ,
glycosides, steroids, protein, carbohydrate and tannins and the n- hexane
extract of SPCS showed the presence of
glycosides, steroids, protein, and flavanoids .
Evaluation of Micromeretic parameters like bulk
density, tapped density, Compressibility index and angle of repose were done to
check the flow properties of SPCD and SPCS. The result shows that the two
samples have good flow properties. The TLC was performed for fingerprinting of
SPCD and SPCS. The results of TLC shows that the Rf
value of SPCD is 0.41 and 0.35 for SPCS.
For fingerprinting of the SPCD and SPCS an attempt has been made with
the help of spectroscopic studies because of its simplicity. The U.V-Spectrums
of solutions form of SPCD and SPCS indicates prominent and identical peaks for
aqueous and alcoholic extracts respectively. The peaks are sharper at lower
concentration while diffuse as the concentration is increase. An overlain
spectrum reflects the studied extract to have some component in same ratio.
The absorption maximum at designated
wavelength can be utilized to evaluate consistency of the product and
constituents. It may be utilized for product evaluation for adulteration where
addition of excess of inorganic substance and substituted constituents, etc.
The prepared sample dilution for aqueous
(0.20-1ml) and alcoholic (0.20-1ml) solution of SPCD and SPCS shows linearity
in the absorbance at nm and nm respectively. The absorption maxima at
designated wavelengths can be utilized to evaluate consistency of the product
and constituents. Linearity studies make feasible quantitative estimation of
components in SPC contributing for generating the maxima at designated
wavelength. The regression data for linearity studies of SPCD water extract
shows 0.985 and for SPCD alcohol extract shows 0.989 while
of SPCS water extract shows 0.995 and for SPCS alcohol extract shows 0.997 respectively. Static analysis
shows significant difference in data
obtained among all batches.
CONCLUSION:
Ayurvedic medicine Shivakshar
Pachan churna has been
standardized by intervention with modern scientific quality control measures
and for the development of finger printing methods. The results obtained of
SPCD and SPCS found to be comparable
with each other like in extractive value, micromeretic
properties, Rf values, Phytochemical tests and U.V
analysis. These finding may be applicable for quality control and finger
printing of different companies of same Ayurvedic
products. So far since no attempt has been made to standardization and
comparable studies of an Ayurvedic formulation of Shivakshar Pachan churna of different companies products. This is the small
step towards the development of quality control methods and finger printing of
different companies same products. This will also helps to produce uniform standard
product and will be helpful in detecting adulteration or substandard product in
traditional Ayurvedic formulation.
The TLC analysis also showed as a
comparable finger printing of two companies of a SPCD and SPCS. Hence these
parameters and developed methods for their determination may be considered as a
tool for quality control, and identification methods of traditional
formulations. This will also assist the regulatory authorities, scientific
organizations and manufacturers in identification and comparing their product
with other company same product.
REFFERENCES:
1.
The Ayurvedic
Formulary of India, 1, 2, the controller of publication, Delhi.
2.
Parihar Singh Sandeep "Standardization of Ashokarista
Formulation by TLC method”, International Journal of Pharm
Tech Research Vol.2, No.2, pp 1427-1430.
3.
Singh Himmat
"Standardization of Arjunarishta formulation by
TLC method” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and
Research, Vol 2, Issue 1, May- June 2010 pp25-28.
4.
Shukla, Karunakar
"Development of Quality Control Parameters of Bhaskar
Lavan Churna: A Traditional
Ayurvedic Formulation” Taiwan Pharmaceutical Journal,
2007, 59, 47-56.
5.
Indian Pharmacopoeia, Vol.3, Government
of India, Ministry of Health and Family welfare. Ghaziabad: Indian Pharmacopoeia
Commission, 2007.
5.
Anonymous, Quality Control methods for
medicinal plant material (World Health Organization), 2002.
6.
Khandewal K.R, Practical
Pharmacognosy, (Nirali Prakashan
Pune), 2000,149.
Received
on 20.12.2013 Modified on 15.01.2014
Accepted
on 19.01.2014 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy & Phytochem.
6(2): April-June 2014; Page 70-74